Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114010
Return-Path: <andre@webkr.de>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 31617 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2021 18:22:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2021 18:22:45 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923861804CC
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 11:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <andre@webkr.de>
Received: from mail.webkr.de (mail.webkr.de [78.47.173.34])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 26FAF1A0681;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2021 20:22:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=webkr.de; s=dkim;
	t=1617992551; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references;
	bh=dmHMkKClNg+zNXnUwa0HfLudctezZGhQycNWuZ20XLI=;
	b=adYEDgB8LbvXr8mw1vhq9v8bOUDs3Afvg46v1U18Jj4A0NnAU9AYfbYzRH3ZxGuVwdv/za
	Rn0jyr4i/GzpoywuX1OzeT+LJwwFvRYsfMOkjqqxRMFVWjTATYVMyR9O5p2xqn1grf6r2o
	/m5uByLobUnnJ/erCBkCWwnRhIErqEM=
To: "'Mohammad Eftekhari'" <bluemmb22@gmail.com>,
	<internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CANE0S5DjgVEAnQGiA9b8cHOCDWwk-Ww9ibTwk2pYeFdsqXGbHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANE0S5DjgVEAnQGiA9b8cHOCDWwk-Ww9ibTwk2pYeFdsqXGbHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:22:20 +0200
Message-ID: <0f1601d72d6d$4b279750$e176c5f0$@webkr.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQKPwdfTK2sZAcXN2jfV76/8MAlvjak7VilQ
Content-Language: de
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] FPM: Three-Phase running idea for faster frameworks
From: andre@webkr.de (=?utf-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_H=C3=A4nsel?=)

Have you tried Roadrunner? I think your design is quite similar =
(identical?) to what Roadrunner does, only that your
worker pool is managed by FPM instead of Roadrunner and that the worker =
exits after serving one request - which you=20
*can* do with Roadrunner, but it's not recommended.