Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113800 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35027 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2021 14:45:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2021 14:45:40 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7E01804D3 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:41:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1616769714; bh=7WNn5FkYcQ3RlYIG+ropv8W7Qe/kOu6PUIdZ921vcBc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ftdcwwd3KPrHGVam3yLcVlP2X03UX0LxyRdo1/TISdGBzv8TTUI4319A9fUQ4EzNk 8DTPAtJYcWqOxYr3CS54RCjW2LxUJafAiNuxz2ZjYP0z4Ks3jLq8UYVVbnsOG0mYZ0 MziwIJFSbLaPzv+LtvHMGA5y6dU3acTS5+tF5688= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.130] ([84.179.253.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MryXN-1m1q1U3bgD-00nyyP; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:41:53 +0100 To: Nikita Popov , PHP internals References: Message-ID: <7960f1c9-2f72-f923-47db-91dbc0a99b5a@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:41:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9n763+ldfyT912528r997zXqejdGeMfuipiTePJlteNzldsQRov OK1KRhXypOh/FMAmtbcHbFhzkh7kgXancGTSVGOlt3/6DTS9qqDcL3rxmbs/P2iRAM0lGIy vBTSh8hw0fDgJMmggD3iR8QSZwYxVdyPVSRJHVd2UeRSmrjDAKvlOYp18HQsWaFVgBjtCcW lYKJBLgzqZk1NzYRkM6xQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:uOXwgEk2TQE=:njxlXHKCaSPWqwMmdve0rY xOo9Cf7ur8jAm032ajcbWLaras1EOAKFW9EUrqtSsWmRtdNphZa5lREu9t1Q9uMF0Z1koYJoT SigWO2ZIY/zjkZiQAPijzKk/qKSqtEJqEmZ/kAoHqCcgEFiBryiOPLPWCJ6a56Fuyd0DgMIqP /J7yxZBlTElO61NnGDFDFRzziug532V8OpPwr3EYYKd8XOue963GihV2mM/oDbGACjRXMX+Sn 5PpCVPsVaK9p1vQvKBmXaFRnmwasQ4A1iGqZLNtSkBScmMLPE1GWqZ/pTaNQuRcuy03BXB5AY m0VHit+hj5mnky9su74UxjNyYFjHLIbxGPqBu4EPDqe2vu+UbCgncfOwMRkcHKj5D+b+u6lwp RSaW92LioMDqxupPRHD6RKpYbfvxHj8PT6g20cc1b99cbxXCiisJqj/AlSIjeQ89S1CAo/usa hDgMTWTyp23yRtXj6c3eq/fXOWqo+e9mVS8cSyXVYa8iGW6s+Ie93zFiPIlNItXDnWCs0w8wU C7Xp+3NYjYbyHtIGRIJefQJwKMIcshRIFYlaitGKhwLBiYLB/sUc6LkYOrYe7Wzu8TyS9erak fAMQeV3clmoAnaWthK5jUOdUZIHgW4TWI/CWJUge4gTa5UjwgeGaiZvme9s/rC14JfpvwNxT4 3w20trjtN6DI64qPix+/BgmIMNuUAZpVOk9Qvi3eYRXFiiXPwIUHGsJlSfDB93yvA18xAASX4 J5hYi+tSAGSPKjYNsG8ee4fW+G5FC3FvweYEl1B77CQLqvmDzVGfS6fBR2U1h+KoRImL0HIj0 RMT2wGGzIc5e5s3QbowVsiu9bqyB6VkNjRN6cl1n3ntMhbtL6O5LH/CFEcSISYJ0D4/nynvVe TMetOGlvBqSn5SXDmnGYoInsxLPVzoIL8d0iqjiy3dPDedSiis22IIzjhZJLbngCrpJp25U5K m4UOzJwVii03R+IB+sW47HtYXh3QvTC23m77Hr36wBKYAJvNwiigFrLxQqNlrOmsFHES9OFlZ EDri3f7PlG3ZxbR/PtuW47ze30tGx8ZaAd8fD55mcM5FckiQva9Cmav4uk4qNhqy3T9SnW/L+ +/u2XRg13ArWClKt04jMM5+dDym08TqbdOb4Ep3IpyrNsa4K1tr9rkVncYzxOWlca/K8p3xcE ZAXDwM1PmzPqrpU/orZLAenYqhOfLiPFrdsDfwG0+WKq6g85gbNsreAyEhf8qqE8rTYcE= Subject: Re: [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 8.1 From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 22.03.2021 at 10:24, Nikita Popov wrote: > It's time for another deprecation RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_1 > > As we're still early in the release cycle, it's still possible to add > additional deprecation candidates, given reasoning for the deprecation, = as > well as available alternatives. I'd like to propose the deprecation of odbc_result_all()[1]. My main motivation for getting rid of this function is to reduce unnecessary complexity in the ODBC extension. I doubt that this function is used (often) in production code, and even for quick experiments/tests it is unlikely to be helpful. For those needing it, it shouldn't be hard to implement it in PHP. [1] =2D- Christoph M. Becker