Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113703
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 22445 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 20:15:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 20:15:33 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3C1804D8
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <me@kelunik.com>
Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.161])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616443850; cv=none;
d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002;
b=gqsBgNUYkr1o70txSwXjfcGRa5b1vyIWzn6MwIUDIsQG2nKCJch95i9hbtU55R5uCk
3AzRGSqN0Z3PmM2azoQ3PkmQ/6N/j5XfL8MYH1v8YDNvJZLkjanH9pMws5PPWFgTl1Gf
ATTdng029kIEiO8B52iU7uqqgDtFmAmAPaKBHuwsl87FOiARxJVhWt4uRIjacDLef7Bz
Op2OqfObWELyW4XrzW8rqvqtzEve+xQjzaLWN4L6LkNPYwsCnLfRfvJ6nncMMFE1UXOH
+w5/8/ltRS1raGyjOUzr8XTxaglZ8qUTdZl9ssfoeNVhuv2iH5rq4yxrZUhcVF1ya4ft
w1WA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1616443850;
s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com;
h=To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Date:From:
Subject:Sender;
bh=U1Yf0VeQbnXEXTk6VKkc8Dw/681AWeugkD4/ENOLHT4=;
b=aH61mdKHNp2P/0IfFULh2VeOPgf6xiCARiPXPf4DAaejurWlFchb2YU5Sukq8pa32Z
JHJ+GAwDhxSg9ijLl+Ghe2R3RJdUo7ElBRREptFNNjvunoj1gdHxuiKS53R3bhHBnQ2g
xdwoGdbhlx1muSmFzg2yjwZZIi+eXgJ719IhDG+7GkLD3KFGUfsBrJyFgltybQAodkPA
AentgqdvWjb4bXjNKaCNO0TWIkBSs7SLJYGsIj/ZwboQiyRt51/Z+VT13BK1nqvjAqdG
8FZxMOmnv6kd+OhCyXshJnyJm10TgSRV+dC4CC9fpnABukmiBjOQFkuKMMtFxUYQXGVi
at2g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com;
dkim=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1616443850;
s=strato-dkim-0002; d=kelunik.com;
h=To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Date:From:
Subject:Sender;
bh=U1Yf0VeQbnXEXTk6VKkc8Dw/681AWeugkD4/ENOLHT4=;
b=iF4ov7Ec+hoW6lk5rhme/RU9cBXlFxMUeiuCNQ4iKnRx8v3e6IXV38pmf+kN05gpzg
bntVhoWz+uRm60n8SNIkOqZHe4nKe9u21bfGUZLeuQIVakqM0iVQPIXw1oDhHlZCbrjU
QhWeZiG8yLiVkjMcxxFvWbrB9QTYBL7G9AjU5v/LwZfYoiqk7BRMLfhvCue1dh6v6gWb
bAmr/mgsRloPG+xzWbDNUNMf+GtZkbhqd7Icx7hxm/KxyCSz59a8G3uZzmWIAHx7YK8y
D4y3F0sj1nLg5UxQil90On1xQKkinhDtKZkGQQGOcxD4ZagO6NLNgv69+Vgswco2rvCt
iCUQ==
Authentication-Results: strato.com;
dkim=none
X-RZG-AUTH: ":IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mlsGbEv0XHBzMIJSS+jKTzde5mDb8AaBAcYyRB"
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com
by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.21.0 AUTH)
with ESMTPSA id x06d76x2MKAoHCr
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
for <internals@lists.php.net>;
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:10:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id kk2-20020a17090b4a02b02900c777aa746fso9114213pjb.3
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+23vaDZoE1/RycH45kdCFVgfyGv1nS/NI0Sj3vlhqjxkNqtXE
xqyLW7xTuIN10LFU/2iSNXqkV2SOHm5Ib7A2KiQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaPvrOyqNFP/EAD+2URnLSmhL6enKlTSdMNTAB9YoVHcPEThx2hQzWf9qPM8e0Gd6ubDcTxwao/VF1Yi3GsNo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f010:: with SMTP id bt16mr792989pjb.116.1616443849654;
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D376DEFE-26A4-4F11-8548-D9454087E9FD@trowski.com>
<CAAKU0u=edrH2KkPO0fXV=srVgweYeOytdzWDkQXU6mE5OsoSww@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+kxMuTs6azmxbtXw5a26A12jJ7OB3fjb_=VFy9STU4ai-TugQ@mail.gmail.com> <96A0EE3F-A225-4ED9-9306-67F05B0C3CB4@benramsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <96A0EE3F-A225-4ED9-9306-67F05B0C3CB4@benramsey.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:08:12 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDCj26gajKOPaVSRrKi5NV8mTqd7jf_LbpQyfAzCuosVJrg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDCj26gajKOPaVSRrKi5NV8mTqd7jf_LbpQyfAzCuosVJrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com>, Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com>,
php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007545e905be25a9c2"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers
From: me@kelunik.com (Niklas Keller)
--0000000000007545e905be25a9c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> >> I hope others would
> >> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections?
> >
> > Yes, I object.
> >
> > You've been around PHP internals long enough to see the drama has
> > occurred on other RFCs where people have been
> > cajoled/pressured/threatened to either suspend votes or withdraw RFCs.
> >
> > Although this RFC is reasonably free from drama, I think it was wrong
> > for you to ask for an extension regardless of the current voting. Not
> > only is it improper on its face, but it sets a bad precedent for more
> > drama filled RFCs.
> >
> > cheers
> > Dan
> > Ack
> >
> > btw I would prefer that all RFC votes were longer (e.g. 4 weeks for
> > all decisions that don't have an external time constraint), but
> > changing the end time during the vote is bogus.
>
> I agree with Dan. Also, there was plenty of discussion time for this
> RFC. It=E2=80=99s not like it was rushed.
>
Hey all,
given the wording in the voting rules, the fact that the RFC hasn't been
edited to include the new end date, and due to the objections, I think the
best way forward is closing the voting on the RFC soon. Given no timezone
is mentioned in the RFC, we can probably go with either UTC or UTC-12.
We'll close the vote after UTC-12 passed.
Please create a new thread for discussions about the voting rules in
general that aren't specific for this RFC to keep this thread focused.
Thanks,
Niklas
--0000000000007545e905be25a9c2--