Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113700 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16514 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 19:36:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 19:36:40 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C591804B7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id f19so15181928ion.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=benramsey.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=USFbYHi3v+VkTcY+ekQCOnOCtBJVdZHZOkpF/hFFU+E=; b=b0m7Ihj2XsVfww+f2ebgo6YDeheK/e7hXNs22SQza2rGLHO7gBX++4f/cA9szau4tF UCHM0R/v15LWeZ809fVZOSI3uLQix88+5d9Os4mYD+rVpAySbBEKUfp7TpTdOD27VUxQ BYWJeVnV2L0EeO8YHUD8wivHlnX8mKWfLHgULdgMfBCMtdv9AjiPyzfpBC2NHfPBwfEV sMJHpwAG6ibO+L5IvTkLQBNcaFFbMA14BxQBKJyjALjEOk9D5nhp4aPE4FwvrC8RNG2P 1/eAt7opLIcGHEgHJHVUEM0vNP3WrMx4m3KimFjmuR3FwcK4BbEZTIzuOJkLyE00DkFF BxLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=USFbYHi3v+VkTcY+ekQCOnOCtBJVdZHZOkpF/hFFU+E=; b=bM8PLAQ6ZbHL3jBjzq9buENIN8GD2bz6g85QTHUWXtUpEJD1Yc8YEGYF4PfXFuyiCx H2JVifgqJYdabOqBtMf+bWglbB5R5z6UCI11m7glouNcpDk6FAGSYb5rbziYAmHLewMf PK9Yd8vUQSLqRmKGwCyzER/IwQZZgGDY8g6eDexJeeehBySOnUwvJOS4cxvtXcCVcoUi S5sGt61OknF3byLxD7H1aojwMJsbEiyHYgV/UqP8uIopjN+V6nWEAqvMUAlTEWGz1WXo OwyFRDeJHUwkq6dwACp6hHLqEDZ9MFQQd6Il4wlKemGDpM+RZRVga9x/qODRB9PBahtT ODFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304mXDXSPl5blGhfoLBnCiHXlPeQMrqgc+nEOKYDydpUjH+ivQo peOW4rMtr5sBdFsAjAHWs8akz6ot7JNwxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSJpYlzBQmTrUdWPyTYBRxhXhlFny2yLMgxdncehI2R99i4bN+hP2m2YgGY+uk4Q6PEp2yXA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b447:: with SMTP id d68mr1093133iof.87.1616441513844; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.42.56] ([96.61.105.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q20sm8450108ilj.56.2021.03.22.12.31.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D27B5434-364D-4194-9DF8-444E66148910"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:31:51 -0500 References: To: php internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <96A0EE3F-A225-4ED9-9306-67F05B0C3CB4@benramsey.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers From: ben@benramsey.com (Ben Ramsey) --Apple-Mail=_D27B5434-364D-4194-9DF8-444E66148910 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Mar 22, 2021, at 13:21, Dan Ackroyd wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 20:53, Levi Morrison via internals > wrote: >> I hope others would >> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections? >=20 > Yes, I object. >=20 > You've been around PHP internals long enough to see the drama has > occurred on other RFCs where people have been > cajoled/pressured/threatened to either suspend votes or withdraw RFCs. >=20 > Although this RFC is reasonably free from drama, I think it was wrong > for you to ask for an extension regardless of the current voting. Not > only is it improper on its face, but it sets a bad precedent for more > drama filled RFCs. >=20 > cheers > Dan > Ack >=20 > btw I would prefer that all RFC votes were longer (e.g. 4 weeks for > all decisions that don't have an external time constraint), but > changing the end time during the vote is bogus. I agree with Dan. Also, there was plenty of discussion time for this RFC. It=E2=80=99s not like it was rushed. Cheers, Ben --Apple-Mail=_D27B5434-364D-4194-9DF8-444E66148910 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQToXQMR3fpbrPOmEOewLZeYnIwHGwUCYFjwpwAKCRCwLZeYnIwH G31vAP4z7n4mvmjoN+SkxsMEm2FM1f/mjSRddXt5pBkIbBQmEAEAhaJjSXPXObBo lLUkRWzkMh5ucejSyOK78bZxXy+JKK0= =IXAx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D27B5434-364D-4194-9DF8-444E66148910--