Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113698
Return-Path: <danack@basereality.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 9393 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 18:26:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 18:26:42 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893C01804DC
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <danack@basereality.com>
Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com (mail-vs1-f41.google.com [209.85.217.41])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id v2so7977834vsq.11
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc;
bh=A93NX46Iek4FPur9MR1fyKk3yNq5Xa1c35Ica03JjdE=;
b=z04g3n4M8Hkfc9DMcpdyfoiBwrpr79Y+MYWJc/d8fke9xwyfPodH8u2eZeEVEMZdfR
VrijnGETjoueXcB2h8P27W89TT14S+IJTKoeePLNiGQdD+MCqgxnofTXT3vlKXM+pyzv
gwc+VCjs8dVdiPZrS8akRNxxqQi9GbJlyHACY10daxc8CbjPl8mcKisoxyWyEWjAHYQr
BVENgI6buDp0xiICgZKzcFw+x5fL0wEYffosuj48UjlwoXzpPw1Cx0xoDl/iMH2YDdQw
jra2JpIqfcDi1ZzS8OgTVr8fqb6MJvlVJpMo0qGeUNhkES+L10lfIr20rAqhcPt9Zu1N
fNuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=A93NX46Iek4FPur9MR1fyKk3yNq5Xa1c35Ica03JjdE=;
b=RpmfPJkrzOhtWqexWiasyKnaCum+GCZUOQNJnw4D1bj0R4dZtE6krNmZT+5S4qwJJU
JcjIk3AL1/tft1nvN4vCWicgCCaFGhTh913X8WYFyvjUky3t6w70x1tXr0X7MnoxFjcK
j0+bXACzXy/r27apHvpHn8KU3oLI5YU5cA5L447xaS/pq8HmVvAyBm3f0MpCpp7YGecv
lamyqrda9sUuVIeQ90OiGemNr2X9wlfEFQYZtPAErMh6GjmGmlLUw9YxuEbpxFkxvWkB
7TrlmqBmqTYOy2nYAzsML/rQn5R+rpZbHMo1ItW+dWxiv1Mmud/McaSyffoiXhgdmt7s
1oDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PWmzGVwaobx9LClye44SLiRwmjyf86X2OBEH97DjApiFhPkcn
/aZaHuTeh5djW36fHKjjW0t2SgFYpcyNVS8VddtDHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYAoK11SQ81MqpqKUyDFv2WPPkOlh+7VbQ91LMriC+OMxk/voarZlKuu7Jr4jclUNnY2Ah7i/Mo0B66fNWhtM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2042:: with SMTP id q2mr970418vsr.24.1616437318399;
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D376DEFE-26A4-4F11-8548-D9454087E9FD@trowski.com> <CAAKU0u=edrH2KkPO0fXV=srVgweYeOytdzWDkQXU6mE5OsoSww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAKU0u=edrH2KkPO0fXV=srVgweYeOytdzWDkQXU6mE5OsoSww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:21:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+kxMuTs6azmxbtXw5a26A12jJ7OB3fjb_=VFy9STU4ai-TugQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
Cc: Aaron Piotrowski <aaron@trowski.com>, php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers
From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd)
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 20:53, Levi Morrison via internals
<internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
> I hope others would
> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections?
Yes, I object.
You've been around PHP internals long enough to see the drama has
occurred on other RFCs where people have been
cajoled/pressured/threatened to either suspend votes or withdraw RFCs.
Although this RFC is reasonably free from drama, I think it was wrong
for you to ask for an extension regardless of the current voting. Not
only is it improper on its face, but it sets a bad precedent for more
drama filled RFCs.
cheers
Dan
Ack
btw I would prefer that all RFC votes were longer (e.g. 4 weeks for
all decisions that don't have an external time constraint), but
changing the end time during the vote is bogus.