Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113692 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98868 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 17:30:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 17:30:19 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B646B180539 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from 2.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net [178.32.119.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from player699.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.110.103.168]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D28D1F73E3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:25:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from php.earth (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (Authenticated sender: peter.kokot@php.earth) by player699.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FB691C48C3D7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results:garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-95G001128f2fee-9de2-4d38-b8b1-4ebb286958a6, 684D371E9795A3C005C8F43A08E13DFFAA3A99A2) smtp.auth=peter.kokot@php.earth X-OVh-ClientIp:209.85.167.45 Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id a198so22510647lfd.7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:25:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZYh8kCzHGOQCGBfSF3hKg8agA9Uo4aYCVoQwK0AF4qxp+KVoN FmUvt41BK+RektxUgiYR1sKt4fISJuH02T+EiSc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIJhOTHA67VHv9oRHGDK5SSVSiDOosF7CPF8BqdCW3j16ZpVz3G9+2dsqg8m/8TrjEFV0DZZZYJwZ946ZIi68= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5f0a:: with SMTP id 10mr233366lfq.415.1616433932459; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:25:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3C81350E-296A-4514-A0DB-45A4B05F2266@trowski.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:25:21 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Guilliam Xavier Cc: "G. P. B." , php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15207811518096200138 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeggedguddttdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeggfhgjhfffkffuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghrucfmohhkohhtuceophgvthhksehphhhprdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeljeekueeuieevveffkeekkefgjedvtdelgfejgeehgfekgfegjeffffeihfetueenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpvddtledrkeehrdduieejrdegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrheileelrdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthhksehphhhprdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepihhnthgvrhhnrghlsheslhhishhtshdrphhhphdrnhgvth Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers From: petk@php.net (Peter Kokot) On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:23, Guilliam Xavier wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:23 PM G. P. B. wrote: > > > > > The thing is that by my recollections votes have already been extended. > > Mostly when there has been issues with the mailing list, or some outside > > event. > > > > Moreso, I don't think extending a vote will in most cases result in the > > outcome > > they want (acceptance), but I might be mistaken. In this case however it > > is a > > bit meaningless as it's already passing. > > So I think if there needs to be a discussion about clarifying the voting > > RFC > > document it should be made in a different thread. > > > > Best regards, > > > > George P. Banyard > > > > You're right. Sorry, I didn't intend to start a debate (nor to be rude to > Levi), just being probably overly cautious ("better safe than sorry", I > remembered that some people challenged the validity of votes on the basis > of "bureaucratic" arguments in the past, and wanted to avoid that here)... > (In this case I personally find it reasonable, but who am I?) > > Just in case, let's record that the result is currently 48:14 ;) > > -- > Guilliam Xavier +1 for extending the voting phase for a week. World will not end. If anything, everyone will be more confident that the RFC voting results were the correct choice for further development of async PHP. Even if one week more would change the voting results, then extending the voting was a correct choice.