Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113690 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96256 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 17:27:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 17:27:28 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5D18053D for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id o10so22489978lfb.9 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3Gz0P/PyykPm9Oc+eQFlJcc/3xksNc+oJpfVUqE5d5w=; b=OXndfaftT9XuSYZBjPBKIcr0N5aWQxgrZoq6x8rA7e41t9q3jK1Iqaa69q75yy4xxT +mW0Xw3OGcmEBinHRr9i8QzCzUj8N/CAAHhbJyE4iVkY80xQIj9BEwwoY0J5RKfW75Ek 46CC6t0+Qm18mYAHrC1IGVu3Fi0qBuh297jSVF5cxM7oDuh/EEhaVyTRQMfo/P21hgkJ E2lsYXDdvsI288LHQFDmSEu8j+YIjp0akuAPfkcN64v0ifrNyVS+tvFmMnl+f7qdYIIp Y0p+SBBx3MQhjHYBN6IlrdfYr8u4tYH8wb8kYmUmp+KSRaO6XMFeCnFO6bLukaRYmO0g Or0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Gz0P/PyykPm9Oc+eQFlJcc/3xksNc+oJpfVUqE5d5w=; b=qV6ZDRg512UuEgJ5FYglkGOSCwUui16HuMlreJZGTpjnv0dHK+Uvo5G8vs9Klw6AYz FakJjt0T6McoAfMQioBrl1p94D9hB7nb0+A/bW0XBMzIaO+MGuyi2BJVTyk+QPeLVAEm +xUIBsinCGppZ0DcZeIecxbISwV7qF5nDHNik5Nk+ZCFv3rVCnZaH3qx8UU8d1A4hXlq AGdZcrGE+svBAgPfrtWOrY7lwQNc7JAhKObxFfa+bAve++b7IHFk+FhhyTEB8UKMih9l Xuj5rCN2iN2hzi6Tlf+cgno7SSudUvS0hPU9ZNn97zr0IGlOcJA+/Sref6sYh7qtDWAG oR5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vI5LW50o3g0C61SdtzB9bhJbh8+v87xufWoLkMDDBoYE6j60n htjAivhEj1x5mPdUGwJUGq+/aZvkgPcEBmnIBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTk9DE57bxRONXXOFR+hIr6gVU+7l4bw31qDcvsfOnNdmqIIlC1LEeDC60wblqbd3s3cwnTQbTusmxgjiF5G8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:484d:: with SMTP id 13mr233767lfy.124.1616433764172; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:22:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3C81350E-296A-4514-A0DB-45A4B05F2266@trowski.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: "G. P. B." Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051081105be23503b" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers From: guilliam.xavier@gmail.com (Guilliam Xavier) --00000000000051081105be23503b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:23 PM G. P. B. wrote: > > The thing is that by my recollections votes have already been extended. > Mostly when there has been issues with the mailing list, or some outside > event. > > Moreso, I don't think extending a vote will in most cases result in the > outcome > they want (acceptance), but I might be mistaken. In this case however it > is a > bit meaningless as it's already passing. > So I think if there needs to be a discussion about clarifying the voting > RFC > document it should be made in a different thread. > > Best regards, > > George P. Banyard > You're right. Sorry, I didn't intend to start a debate (nor to be rude to Levi), just being probably overly cautious ("better safe than sorry", I remembered that some people challenged the validity of votes on the basis of "bureaucratic" arguments in the past, and wanted to avoid that here)... (In this case I personally find it reasonable, but who am I?) Just in case, let's record that the result is currently 48:14 ;) -- Guilliam Xavier --00000000000051081105be23503b--