Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113672 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65632 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2021 15:03:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2021 15:03:05 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0401C1804DD for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f181.google.com (mail-il1-f181.google.com [209.85.166.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id t14so5268571ilu.3 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=benramsey.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=uSvS7S+9ebZMCs4gxKPXMhLEjNBLQwAjhul2EsCWkOc=; b=SfG0fG+B3y1H+kE6QtHkbxzUUKo86CR4xR7/vS1iZgU+a9whNWw34dAw+/dIT9k4l+ +NFRiFs9p5XAS8NJbF2qB4vCfyWykDL1QvHh/MHNYjm7LH3/JVkEd18dduf9rEzyVGZj uEmfNCxhY5OoilonbvK/hVZz/emL+QC/AwS8uiLJlIUT7gA5c/eKyeJC3vYevl2g+pdr wxsgT2t8Oga7xprhVn7I9hSbnaEke/iyC9paOdmXZtmpwvu1rMiubvRn5IeRfVfuoUiH YMSCL9T6sTX0OMSP2Yc9MBzZupEYGu8a5xLqSwZzw9CEovYzavvc23bW5Ap3tzySq6uY Qcbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=uSvS7S+9ebZMCs4gxKPXMhLEjNBLQwAjhul2EsCWkOc=; b=XK3faCYTvjsvv1yhX7qlDzT8vrjD2RO+seYBF2iq+F38Kyas6AsP/ypmthMUGihKnm /MlMruyHRWS4i6wlRezS8g5eu6tkFD/SkIz3S/4ok0M9HoICOt4ztVOvq5usiqFUBqFK g2BsUy9fm3ccm1lE4xhTd/9jX2Muwt06utJ5syArxwIWJwVmTbBqs8Y8uTb5rBs0B6ET sotwtKh62iDLELDOeojFRCGlZgaxLyHSbCP10NnT+i8pjnruGl9C3gR7xquSINNgoBQN jHi6KWhM+XfowwWcB0XEsi7swhb3tVKq7qFtakoPNvSxIMSly/1ZZ8HUlReClHA8JktW 0T3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cUv0iPM5d9BAIy1p4NicOIl6U+RZmxBj1VLP/jSltYDfl9Qlg ZBewqgifS5c3ibPu7pvv8v4xcbZW29HMsg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxpw6erEWR9QCAr6UrE8OBwIcFnHIffG380mozdVLkN19TXMRiM4eF7MAGVa/g7vlEO3LKnHA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1608:: with SMTP id t8mr325626ilu.183.1616425097937; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.42.56] ([96.61.105.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k17sm1131424ilr.57.2021.03.22.07.58.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 07:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F008EAAD-E327-45F6-A5B7-84F43524E095"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:58:16 -0500 References: To: PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 8.1 From: ben@benramsey.com (Ben Ramsey) --Apple-Mail=_F008EAAD-E327-45F6-A5B7-84F43524E095 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Mar 22, 2021, at 04:24, Nikita Popov wrote: >=20 > Hi internals, >=20 > It's time for another deprecation RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_1 >=20 > This is a collection of minor deprecations that various people have = put > together over the last ~2 years. This RFC was formerly targeted at PHP = 8.0, > but was delayed to PHP 8.1 to reduce the amount of changes necessary = for > PHP 8.0 compatibility. >=20 > As usual, each deprecation will be voted in isolation. >=20 > As we're still early in the release cycle, it's still possible to add > additional deprecation candidates, given reasoning for the = deprecation, as > well as available alternatives. >=20 > Of course, if there are compelling technical reasons why something = should > not be deprecated, we can move things into the "Removed from this = proposal" > section, in which case it will serve as documentation why some > functionality should not deprecated. Given Rowan=E2=80=99s thread [1] on `utf8_encode()` and `utf8_decode()`, = should we consider adding these functions to this list or mentioning them in this RFC as being handled separately? Cheers, Ben [1] https://externals.io/message/113645 --Apple-Mail=_F008EAAD-E327-45F6-A5B7-84F43524E095 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQToXQMR3fpbrPOmEOewLZeYnIwHGwUCYFiwiAAKCRCwLZeYnIwH G7r9AP96UuAkn55X6xwv/1+BFRyc/WC7wmilthLfczF6XlfsvAD8C0q9mKF8Vb44 lwX3ma47/SbNbgb02sOWRB5D1FoenoM= =UHxO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F008EAAD-E327-45F6-A5B7-84F43524E095--