Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:11365 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91312 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jul 2004 07:09:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91223 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 07:09:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gw2.emini.dk) (192.38.9.232) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 07:09:18 -0000 Received: from lamp (client-39-p-2-lns.winn.dial.virgin.net [81.103.216.38]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302713978F; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: To: "Frank M. Kromann" Cc: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:15:09 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <10902805122040000@9866357972520000.9866341568840000> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32 From: steph@zend.com ("Steph") References: <10902805122040000@9866357972520000.9866341568840000> well.. would it kill anyone to have iconv built-in anyway? I mean by default built-in? At present that's done purely for libxml but Frank's right, gtk+ also has it as a dependency. Are these the only two areas that rely on iconv at all? We had a discussion about integrating iconv before now (iliaa, me, moriyoshi) but at the time the focus of the discussion was mbstring. AFAICR there's been no further discussion about it. Wez could answer me a question here: if iconv was built-in, would it now (or will it soon be) possible to ensure that it was built prior to libxml or any other extension that might rely on it? And who cares about BSDI anyway? ;) > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:frank@kromann.info] > Sent: 20 July 2004 00:42 > To: steph@zend.com > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32 > > > Thats true, but php-gtk uses iconv too and I can see php with iconv > build-in and libxml and php-gtk compiled as shared objects so you can use > gtk without libxml and without iconv.dll. > > - Frank > > > Won't this become a chicken-and-worm situation? The reason the iconv > > exports were put there in the first place was so that the libxml build > could > > rely with confidence on there being built-in support for libxml's own > > built-in iconv functions through PHP, rather than having to lean on an > > external iconv.dll at runtime.. > > > > - Steph > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Frank M. Kromann [mailto:frank@kromann.info] > > > Sent: 19 July 2004 23:32 > > > To: Rob Richards > > > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libxml/libxslt on win32 > > > > > > > > > I've been using these libraries for a while without problems. > > > > > > Can we split the iconv related exports from php_libxml.def to > > > php_iconv.def. This will make it possible to build with iconv, but > without > > > libxml. > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > > If possible can the libxml and libxslt libs get updated to newer > > > versions? > > > > Libs can be found here: http://ctindustries.net/dom/libxml/ > > > > > > > > These version will fix some bugs, provide better libxml/libxslt > support, > > > enable namespace support in xml ext and allow for building of > xmlwriter in > > > pecl. > > > > I have been testing these libs for a bit now (4.3 and 5) and haven't > run > > > into any issues. > > > > > > > > If the libs are update the new php_libxml2.def file needs to be > > > commited. > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > -- > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > >