Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113635 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35093 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90DF1804D8 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:47:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (mail-il1-f173.google.com [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id c17so9466387ilj.7 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=datadoghq.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VBXCMyZEAZbW9PN//zacnHD7wqQ0psvqYPh754gu7YQ=; b=RoWT61+ZHbCFXCqR5Qp9ykkvcXl48Rd2Gy6FUuMO92noBPQy8bqEwn2tv3JiC8dkxd VuGrpzva+ww6XyvWPGhbfQRRaOC32uU34SwKEw77onxWBNA8+RNEy/lM9UePZxX8km93 wVR9A7jNhlepbSoPiLGWjnn819r065BcBImNE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VBXCMyZEAZbW9PN//zacnHD7wqQ0psvqYPh754gu7YQ=; b=Ju0QuYbK97/y8NEHpI4lpnj7STLBlzfk0vFr20VfzLe5TPN9Q+dfWnKAykbONPwlup jitG+n9HTUcbPeQC+LVIyUJbMEmP2DQ7tp60qp00N5vVsHmtRLvAnc1+SX1bsCu2Mhb0 toG0FzwwYbjordOQBL3jr/3RbQgSOSSkkex74GKz1E4H/kbQbEr5lSsSiK9dwErhzG40 JvyUMgBWLnTyvpdsZsodvtC+1XEFQouY9IpMu2mGuirWGIdrhWOgshXnuPQK5xJwCd3G sGf+cWZY+XuJqm6JHS+9iZpLNfbSbrc7mGtvYcXI/FOhhcJERq3vU7PqHn1ljw3nq/Hp 4Shw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eEeH7SZgGixAb5LQS4FKrVreoJcYOso2y1BJaQvMj8JAfoPyi 3+2EtSU8i730uCTQsnexn1GFoL7CFZBnTeeBJcNdrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCfn6N3zNJ01yxuL6+dYsnwmjehr1HlUo8IFdc0Qhcdxx7dh9R8xXU66tueM3us6iAwcNZYkv+6aaSL7XmoDE= X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce84:: with SMTP id r4mr4425264ilo.112.1616194051255; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Levi Morrison Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:47:20 -0600 Message-ID: To: Niklas Keller Cc: Aaron Piotrowski , php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Fibers From: internals@lists.php.net ("Levi Morrison via internals") On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:54 PM Niklas Keller wrote: > > Hey Levi, > >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Aaron Piotrowski wrote: >> > >> > Greetings everyone! >> > >> > The vote has started on the fiber RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers >> > >> > Voting will run through March 22nd. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Aaron Piotrowski >> >> This is selfish, but I would like to kindly request lengthening the >> voting window to allow me more time to play with it. I feel like I >> can't vote "yes" on something like this without more experience with >> it (which is why I currently have voted "no"). I hope others would >> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections? > > > How much time do you think you need? Another week seems reasonable; enough time to evaluate it more thoroughly but not delay things seriously. > I'd be open to an extension if others feel the same way, but I'm not sure how much difference it makes given the RFC would currently pass also with your no vote. This is true. Unless some of the 46 "yes" voters flip, it seems unlikely that we'd have more than 10 "no" voters turn up in 3 days, it seems unlikely to affect the overall result. Still, I would feel happier knowing I voted one way or another after thorough evaluation, and not a quick check and gut feeling. This RFC seems like it could really positively or negatively affect the ecosystem, more so than most other RFCs, and so I'd like more time if possible.