Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113613 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75031 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2021 14:19:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2021 14:19:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFA4180506 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id u10so10216625lff.1 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:13:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u0Orj4Sh49zFtil/Q44AwyDrOeiSKcTgGwQvuT1N/Xo=; b=EBScRyPf+ysyYQXizasZXI8ZhdXE9hur0UO2QZimiH306wpAYeqrTqS7bV12pbioXY nhgG0DyKJtcV2iInosI3eRt29pKpJiVCdvdJmhELruH2XlMAajWXPSVYT2XrO8sV3HGU h1qWXfzjUMHasIROBu4eSDcnx+0JSCFcFIi06LKmBhTjzHPpQHPcnXj6ltpUagj6T+VJ Z/wy/PhLdoEWzDTTkDgzE/iRqMwnBEe77YeHEc/pqhEIf3hbzcnx5tkWdIzciMhQ2SxK NYOrWTxz3yW6JctFva3jUCQc+hShjbdBEWJWkKxWu4/i3nCI2sAXaJktD35/VJUJQO2c mc9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u0Orj4Sh49zFtil/Q44AwyDrOeiSKcTgGwQvuT1N/Xo=; b=cxmWfYvjvRkUiwAE/UZKzXswLe2nAHYkTw3hbNcmhGcSp9w+bPyRYzpZr7d2ATege9 waImRKTIdxIeRyZSNvmRgvt6oEIwOMOZzbA7OTmn0BItiuVDZjCJfnW6EFxS+SDE5PGt pgBTuIEa5MGZCt6p015lg8WOb4T7ctJFHfgdvyy3ZY8pVxcqdJwVDuAhlzHfY4LVkoh5 zmlh84cGut7z7hdsNO3k2tzQ5Xaw0VD34PvJZezuW6RO8Yp9qJqMqH5CbgZAAPE6T4tP QxQo5SEFFMfRKc+GZAVUUEMvlbFMzNTudLLmGfOVO2zy32pbwvHAB2VlzyHqFv9hgAy0 PG4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53292s8ZE4DuNPLd5eajpBRpm0XDD0nlFhIet8mzK85mqzQ5cWxm L0sRRoOlz4p/qUxZSL/i4pLMDSx044QkFzlD13s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQGoWorj6+42EHb48gVTl9KxPKZujh6D2eJP2Jw75olN2KmH7ugNIKPisrLbDfkUeL9+X1aPf83ms8Bq99dBA= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:41d2:: with SMTP id d18mr908190lfi.315.1616163212316; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:13:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:13:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: tyson andre Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b541b05bde452cf" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Namespaced in bundled extensions From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov) --0000000000002b541b05bde452cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:04 PM tyson andre wrote: > Hi Nikita Popov, > > > The question of namespaces in the stdlib has been coming up a lot > recently, > > so I'd like to present my own stab at resolving this question: > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces_in_bundled_extensions > > > > Relative to a number of previous (declined) proposals, the main > difference > > is that I do not propose a top-level "PHP\" vendor namespace, and instead > > recommend the use of "ExtName\", in line with existing practice for > > extensions. I believe this addresses the primary concern with previous > > proposals. > > Both of the namespacing RFCs have been announced for over 3 weeks and I > don't think I've > seen any new discussion since then. > Are any updates planned? When will voting on the namespacing RFC(s) start? > (I had some stdlib RFCs/RFC ideas I was postponing since February to avoid > interfering with the namespacing discussion) > I'd love to have some more feedback on this RFC before opening voting. There has been a lot of discussion beforehand, but only a couple responses to this RFC... Regards, Nikita --0000000000002b541b05bde452cf--