Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113380
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c-HY-0fx+pTmntRJZKcQcZFfk3uJwrZ6FAMAx5_Wj+JHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO11TfEr-_-tZR_yAFF0n1U-Bfa=EtbwX54Cn908xJHomXPsJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO11TfEr-_-tZR_yAFF0n1U-Bfa=EtbwX54Cn908xJHomXPsJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:54:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF+90c_KrRFn03uVXJ157E71=_6RA1nYs532MQoP1jSRPuGCHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gabriel O <gabriel.ostrolucky@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000275e8205bcb7feda"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] New in initializers
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--000000000000275e8205bcb7feda
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:26 PM Gabriel O <gabriel.ostrolucky@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 16:04, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I would like to propose allowing the use of "new" inside various
>> initializer expressions: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/new_in_initializers
>>
>> In particular, this allows specifying object default values for properties
>> and parameters, and allows the use of objects as attribute arguments.
>>
>> The RFC is narrow in scope in that it only adds support for "new". An
>> extension to other call kinds should be straightforward though.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikita
>>
>
>  Does this support anonymous classes? RFC should probably mention that.
>

Anonymous classes are not supported. I've added an explicit mention of that
fact.

Regards,
Nikita

--000000000000275e8205bcb7feda--