Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113253 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80112 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2021 08:35:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2021 08:35:48 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121F5180504 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:24:45 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com (mail-vk1-f177.google.com [209.85.221.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:24:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id f136so1000687vke.7 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:24:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sE8ueDamJcHF8+hifnLfwQm9Mml8Whl/uQhWmh8Y5Ds=; b=YiAzxDpevDI+lx0/G7ef6LOLHfIBk8q3NyAgVzBXMLZv9IfVp0P6DWh6FH/SYTeBXa x7QPLROaKdxCKhkFHnTgHyun8Stz0XV9f7uy3ZGT0ISRXR2TkbsM3Ozu9LrIXWRxzKbD qv+yiT+kAmvoeUzJWmRaOr40Oz81evUr/BIDkeIx82KsobdAIaJUTMmRZ3Cx3S2cghaT /K48EjvP9wl8F0r466cmEIMPESbJek1/Zafhozt5wzZs1O9cJImMcFot8a4gVYVl5G4H c3PFdMcOjdym6otPzxZtnvvqr/1jITxEGY6/elrxcMs/fAmxsE9bAUOHAXszYrbj2XOm WY6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sE8ueDamJcHF8+hifnLfwQm9Mml8Whl/uQhWmh8Y5Ds=; b=BtDeGBx7WPjvJr3zW1G4nI/WyO2cHnyWbuFnWeo7wOadZX6n/PWfUg9EQZ+XxIELyJ WJ8Z1DhQCOTAGCetjxxzdywk2Aw3C8pCs7K0nkhH40OZhbe9HhIofgaC7dvp7A1rZJQN F68XI+9lfcE5e8GGLe9/6tTagGEtE5C4JzWORG4du6DbwUeAv9aK2jYprAe3NPjp58PY QTijeWf5xu1s2XRK2b5P+opWfBMMHJaeF0RbeiC7J9d8cQIErFtldfPpkSSNAme+hTu9 VXanW27hTKCx1kDcOuLU/BV4c4zMziOzbV86s69JsEKxeQVbraZMCvKLbiUDLmVWtGPK Nh/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JvQgdU8q1CrcQEn2z/oyL1W/fgEi6YoA9PiTnQ0ZAqc3Fe9Uo kOt/gkD2UZVEjC7MZuYLEy5ru5YUIL5xfdv29a4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzt+TZWg9QTjZZmpNPz2OTRaVJ4HZfuZ8fa1gabrouhRaRgjCkGKKv1t2hgSaa16wVBfJK30cMHfJ4hLiIO2HY= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1f96:: with SMTP id f144mr761205vkf.16.1614241479774; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:24:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:24:28 +0300 Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fbd79105bc24e1cf" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static variables in inherited methods From: dmitrystogov@gmail.com (Dmitry Stogov) --000000000000fbd79105bc24e1cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +1 On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:02 PM Nikita Popov wrote: > Hi internals, > > While looking into various issues related to static variable handling, I've > become increasingly convinced that our handling of static variables in > inherited methods is outright buggy. However, it's also long-standing > behavior, so I've put up an RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_variable_inheritance > > Regards, > Nikita > --000000000000fbd79105bc24e1cf--