Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113197 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25302 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 18:21:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2021 18:21:09 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684321804B1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:12 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id v14so18347310wro.7 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=lZaIf6/gUPlOprsMuL2yH4aINsXiMBN3saCl0aAju5k=; b=mM78mpD8g/9o/wpDNpgWh75w48ebwE3ouumEFQT6LxJQqw4r3kHQ3wKsyJ/3HiznW/ gzk3ZrLsBBXbnENo8BRF7OPaccOzReCK8kTfCbVJgDdmkcNp7RB/Bl3UVPIfcL7FcpbW adwGRxAtqQPstuj86ckBWgjM4rykK9YDi2OuFn3Ur1S/toPzs5xpY/1pi9eyY2stf/HO SeZ+bNull7mdd+dNSQ0PGVj+VcL0L6WfQiOCIt3Z3xib4Z9yCDVFrX4/PZFp9mwYcM1Y PE/fmd+vmPP2yMQjGye2s4wbDeNSukakHdCZzv96cMWC2vMYwDG5iF9h7SezRV9M93o3 AKFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=lZaIf6/gUPlOprsMuL2yH4aINsXiMBN3saCl0aAju5k=; b=swh1umiHADkHtF/zHIKDiIhfcPdtfQa31wyXq6ocDhZdexGUO67iWIU2at2vpXRCUB 8s0U3ivndewN1ggpqKdvuLeM8WJobEM+x8HIsYrXV+Hmfpj1iB+NHFh0DmImLA75+mJ6 ms/m9ilhBx+2c2l2wABl1l4stw7n4L4cPJA0KXmN+yaW4kgDSCU5PnLYdWPjPFeNDTFs 0g5274k0Fz9o0hy6eRcfKYkNqFL9NIOcFGV36C71x3qc/CtDzvTq6CNHPAGKdeKRd6zk KTM1jPAiVXitrhPjSKmbvKr4H0t/90Xs0pOkMjnButLW/deKmVJpEn8HiW8O2tSgF7YD PH9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yR7gzUX/hKLDEgbSYAwBkWAEuAZtEXuailNr0ACBRqwYLgxjO NRSlvHPylJD6q9GrQpNjg2bGGLk9TSo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI1gXj51yFpmY7sb5LFHJo1iRtiJTkHwHpr42MKQW0k1XzTovgNbull51S1Owb2I2e/oZn3A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1092:: with SMTP id y18mr419946wrw.248.1613585288951; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpc104104-brig22-2-0-cust548.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.10.58.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm4084906wmc.1.2021.02.17.10.08.08 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:08:08 -0800 (PST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <488aad1e-6981-4dee-92f0-cd4128283162@www.fastmail.com> <6bfa34aa-e3e2-23f3-4b66-c051a259cd02@gmail.com> <43C6BC44-6A9F-4645-8307-31971ED8357D@benramsey.com> Message-ID: <31ecea72-d0ff-8aec-530e-266c3a8558a7@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:08:07 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <43C6BC44-6A9F-4645-8307-31971ED8357D@benramsey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Enumerations From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) On 17/02/2021 17:51, Ben Ramsey wrote: >> On Feb 17, 2021, at 11:48, Chase Peeler wrote: >> >> If that were to not pass, though, it seems supporting enum cases as keys would be worth exploring. Fully support allowing all objects as keys though. > > Others, please correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe each enum case is already an object. I think what Chase meant was that if we don't want to allow *all* objects as keys, we could allow *a specific subset*, namely Enum cases. The implementation would be similar, but deliberately limiting the scope might avoid some undesirable edge cases and side effects. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]