Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113193 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11251 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2021 15:39:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2021 15:39:46 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CFC180504 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:26:47 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-vs1-f41.google.com (mail-vs1-f41.google.com [209.85.217.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:26:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a123so4091292vsc.9 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:26:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fffiJvr9fsn/oK7mHrv9Da7t84SBjS8hNyp8aOYG3Lk=; b=Qg1F+wBLCRco7gNSw8Gw2GVU7n77j73f6Mhemdo8BG4Ma/vYbcIXt8DaiC00qf8X21 nDeGP11kHnrJ42TkIpuZUIiFMtI+yCE3rM6KmEmVluifjZ6oaHg3KY2Uy4SI+IhUt/91 ZtzVMj99GuN+ALeva0ElLsy9puZXXgfajJND9thu8lLR0p8sRSPISVSjIYbesYfZuKXY Wcwhi9ZFDHpIGP5kw3EL7/WYsqexIGgTg0FX2VpkYHr4i0kjYr45Bwfzm5X4ljulIJf0 l35mB5P4qQLsFB18p3t/+VrdX9cPUu+ZPh4i7iAgxDAA+YzUysAV5dPuT29GKXb1AwbD W+/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fffiJvr9fsn/oK7mHrv9Da7t84SBjS8hNyp8aOYG3Lk=; b=MzEa7sF5Qxqej+CL+m/TW0Y25e5EUOhXr0pGr2jmUeOrr2BB+XV2+Jo2EH9ZvVDLlG /j28WoXrA3Hm+8gUJij1th4k/lnsg+zjtIax1izklYOB7hwGDOODfuVqsbp2Ip1E7tmn nLINO+54WhyCD+T9Lvb89JsIWWwZS7InLNxDVyvDGwrHPwg0EeBtrC/oGnx51ebA/QSR e9XobT4vqtomAtaWc9/nWriajsK4OEk/59QRKwjVonxppPtXfNPQpCq9nQlxWsfK1e8T tsfKusFRwN2NnZcBoN6SXJB7DMeSy3+9V8cNSb2m8Yv68mAPrr84ButJ1UjWz+z2iIRj xM8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J+lkpCthY286G6i76G5Xb0nUaTihehthF+5l3DajnQsEtxbLD 8Vvtu8lpHe7YaQ9LwkBR7uLpabqeimBrtKBzGAQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCBnRyCbBOSv5LFc2WcTeJFzLRpMBDA85RcN2XoN/wiZh/kBnVaTsVdKJEv761klONnNR/04fQg6R/ZedMJHI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b42:: with SMTP id 63mr14837660vsl.50.1613575603290; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 07:26:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <488aad1e-6981-4dee-92f0-cd4128283162@www.fastmail.com> <6bfa34aa-e3e2-23f3-4b66-c051a259cd02@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6bfa34aa-e3e2-23f3-4b66-c051a259cd02@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:26:32 -0500 Message-ID: To: Rowan Tommins Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a705ba05bb89d87d" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Enumerations From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler) --000000000000a705ba05bb89d87d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:09 AM Rowan Tommins wrote: > On 17/02/2021 14:30, Larry Garfield wrote: > > The Enum RFC has been approved. > > > Thank you and Ilija so much for putting in the effort to make such a > carefully thought-through proposal, and I'm really looking forward to > being able to use it. > > I realise not everyone agrees with the approach, but am hopeful that it > can be expanded on in future proposals to add a lot of power to the > language. > > Regards, > > -- > Rowan Tommins > [IMSoP] > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Glad to see this passed. I definitely would have voted for it if I had a vote. The only thing I wish had been included was the ability to use them as array keys, but definitely don't think the lack of that would be a reason to vote against it - especially since the possibility is still open in the future and adding it wouldn't cause any BC issues. -- Chase Peeler chasepeeler@gmail.com --000000000000a705ba05bb89d87d--