Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113148 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9768 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2021 18:46:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2021 18:46:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4212D1804E4 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:32:28 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com (mail-ua1-f48.google.com [209.85.222.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a16so2057908uad.9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:32:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1EkyFzGu8EgZn3GMTeNswRMeCMBz30+p9ObD65xxu48=; b=QDXndxRGq8vw5cj9vCUwTObl61onpH5Zk8Up1ExdTFLI3AiupcUe0XLV8Ok/G6mYnq +FwU6yQcag7lOEebaNzXzctvTVPhGzhIZHXZZmmG81zZFtGExIX+gS6TzYceWregBgEX +WqtOwM9SGlfGB8yw9Vo7KBQ4zU3sftd1iGU/JeFaTDygWw8aXhyO88TBjcm5nOQvOQ6 xYu1BGOmnpS0TQ7pUv0kXRpjJlMw+Ws6+KaIWmClKlfNHhXZ4EoBy3ZcpcSzGS/4qPb0 RWMAh3tgs5UNq5hFvb35OjJYPxmQ+PHh5Y7+V0MdTqmmdsGj407pal7bK2Q6frQeWJ0y 94Ow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1EkyFzGu8EgZn3GMTeNswRMeCMBz30+p9ObD65xxu48=; b=fonqfO8Z5+65emLyflOSCLwzX4dRIA0iunSAGuph/B/h2xBFkxaT0K6JNgiyHdq6vw 0zecNFnV5yYywI8DniAfhhReLSMnIcP0vqzTjJRtQte9nB6bH8ANlBZkekKaHsmJ4ygw 6Jw5LUJvW/kvy1i7keF1sAhhphWsV7dOVB9hBajD73+JIzSHxxQ0PNLrf/Z721Hs1ATk ahF+QHsjCeCy/ZJAm/W4eE1ItPlKPOkVToJWb5rv+EgOLiQ3d8xo7aJL6rsrluhQWkfh 3YqUWK46k3TFe6buy8cg2WgS+rJavSOeHaDI7SdJ0ToKfnxTDjFO18TwHF8dfrLtfRrM kPGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ccoX/6MaehErGEL8Tp/QC97QEWVD9aVcNByoWp/zkKOXkVMS9 IG0CrY54OXYjFOgW04+7n81yyTigShp66892oX8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx54mySyg6dj391/5fx7WULoOjvtvsWDVvuw5Gquln5nA/ImOGrWgsE/i7cjgleFGNFFu2ogGTv1KPQW08ycQg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:23c1:: with SMTP id c1mr6190825uan.3.1613068344129; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:32:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <60256200.1c69fb81.46e68.6437SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:32:12 -0500 Message-ID: To: Lynn Cc: Levi Morrison , Mark Randall , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a67d0005bb13bd13" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Proposal: namespace the SPL From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler) --000000000000a67d0005bb13bd13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:08 PM Lynn wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:55 PM Levi Morrison via internals < > internals@lists.php.net> wrote: > >> I don't know the answer to that question. However, I don't think we >> should add a deprecation on the very first version that we add the >> aliases anyway. I think that would make for a bad upgrade experience >> from 8.0 to 8.1. I would leave that more for 8.3, 8.4-ish in the >> release cycle so there are at least a few versions for people to >> organically change their code without triggering any notices of any >> kind. >> > > I would very much prefer this to be deprecated in the same version. This > way you prevent the confusion of which of the two to use and have people > implement the one we already know is going to be removed. Deprecations do > not make it a bad upgrade experience at all. Quite the opposite in my > opinion, they hint to me nice and early on which parts of the code base I > have to adjust. The earlier the better. > I'm really ambivalent about when they are introduced, but I actually think I agree with you. I know it's very much just a personal anecdote, but since I don't turn deprecation notices on until I'm ready to actually look for and fix them, I don't find them obtrusive at all. -- Chase Peeler chasepeeler@gmail.com --000000000000a67d0005bb13bd13--