Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:113114 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80131 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2021 16:33:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2021 16:33:46 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:18:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] PHP\iterable\any() and all() on iterables From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 08/02/2021 15:14, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > Den man. 8. feb. 2021 kl. 17.08 skrev Levi Morrison via internals > : >> - I do not like the chosen namespace. This is not as important as the >> previous point, but still factored into my decision as we are still >> very early in choosing namespaces for internals. I don't want to vote >> for something I think is a bad direction when we're this early on. I am voting yes because the functionality is good and the namespace question was polled in advance using the fairest method available.