Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112998 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56395 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2021 18:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2021 18:25:05 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7761804D1 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:06:36 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q12so23940673lfo.12 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:06:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Y8b/YodV7w0Ax8qquRqXbnekPtVYsRjPgUTqxkS6gNY=; b=iUCxyoKmX7xURU9BOC+5DOqGofNbFddttner+7hfNEwmnOTq9A+9Kf3XpuQN4dL/YL 5xDBFvX1NhIkw+95kreY8VsHnJqZbtdgL9YsjVPZ2zhHoTo2uej1j+4vQJ/DV5n8vZnt MiLf5uUuYcTdWVUWonl6NRWO7UkQUKy+DJ3GxflZH3WLVcBk6sBxz2fz5YSeEILtyrq4 8KNXYTa7F5VVUIBmimhivb78AWbInwUIlLEtXnB92EfHsyyZuqCLvgng2BfWgyQ50Tjy CsH6NMuZqxSDbJne/Bl/lKFX6FVgyPThAzXblRHRyG3wNMI1E3EgBxwu+aaXl4eUhEAX 24Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Y8b/YodV7w0Ax8qquRqXbnekPtVYsRjPgUTqxkS6gNY=; b=OJkfQyEP4xQkuFBAniPpTR9A/3f2XZHWwQQNvIUMNxbhNQkl5z+QyZcZqy5d6em1Hh MwGWDtJZ5GhgL9+Jmc2UP2YCGR5sKz+ZFIRet2Ief93ZxbLv/B/ZEiBfSaSuXVm1j3TA s80tipfkggV71SP2vaowJdmE2h1WSAtWbU5byeCbyWX2Fpdjc2YF1HbaEgMj4mG4PNu/ aQ8WY6r0OJYIwBJwUncy6JLtQix4NCFHd79kQwc7PfaWbcLnA829Qu0N4Bq4qNZxdo4d 0XuZ1KMr5DmKLcpgh6THUPa6NU8tFBUMAaN5SK/ovU4Whugb+JRTJKwnAhj/MIgzm9eo dFZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/usHTeROD+whpEl3gzZiedqYuRSwbRTc/+Oxb03m2FdU47HNs Rw7kvD+1qOUrwaLGYnHcnafQDDOjpRGqAF2fI51BqiYAl5yTIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMrrBvIYaD+xxPX42zmWRukq2lY7MsVYZ7e9XvkRwEdLOq31COrQQxXR8N2TptCYasgx+Qd+Y+QIHDNQI6Tzw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3182:: with SMTP id i2mr3173964lfe.553.1611684393489; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:06:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 03:06:22 +0900 Message-ID: To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3993905b9d183de" Subject: Re: [RFC] Object-scope RNG implementation From: zeriyoshi@gmail.com (Go Kudo) --000000000000c3993905b9d183de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RFCs have been reorganized and radically rewritten. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng The implementation is unchanged, but the background has been explained in more detail and the execution speed has been re-verified with PHP 8.1-dev. The proposal seems to have been received relatively positively by externals, but there hasn't been much reaction. I'm unsure when I should start voting on this RFC. Regards, Go Kudo 2021=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=889=E6=97=A5(=E5=9C=9F) 19:00 Go Kudo : > Hi internals. > > I think I'm ready to discuss this RFC. > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng > > Previous internals thread: https://externals.io/message/112525 > > Now is the time to let me know what you think. > > Regards, > Go Kudo > --000000000000c3993905b9d183de--