Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112880 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18926 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2021 17:06:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2021 17:06:30 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A63A1804F3 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:45:00 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-vs1-f52.google.com (mail-vs1-f52.google.com [209.85.217.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:44:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-f52.google.com with SMTP id x26so3449268vsq.1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:44:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wf8JckVuWAASV7R9qb21XlPM7VYWSazCfr2vHuiR8g0=; b=d3xKvXE6k9RQQOazapn9B1PJvO3GgXOiGkHuMkfzAb2ZUgoJvvICNb4Ol1wxGvADTc PB2OFI0hLmtoqG/m8K3TNDl/y5ndqkVYs56VE5kfNrc3R/mEbr4jZMeDU/V5C3hIDxIq V9I2oizh+9dQ7Ej2uKdjJu0hqw0JWuO1fYJJ0I7N/RdO8GcxyFwMI8TeWUPMMylK6/Rg 5HnDT/LddGpi3U+qks4sYzTccJ4Sf6hdWhBd9xlvb4Ao5pNCHfX5de++IJjppyHJDO/f hN0+EysdWoQZQtFO+Vx045YA/GBy/OzFFsoYM0+5IEHchqmzXCXIMqNrPRVPnwegi0H4 jOyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wf8JckVuWAASV7R9qb21XlPM7VYWSazCfr2vHuiR8g0=; b=uJ4jKADjzj37mpNLY+gGgKn/ZsAz3e5H/coK72HI1AocdtKwT/gFwFgj+oOmDylm6k eo7I2gxCwaIcTQIdY/75bAwGO2U5ZM6qK/z+Tcy0bZbrAHwY3DxhOIrFLFRCsT7swGWm qxW96VdkSVjdGqYTl3IQvIX0MiFJLFCS63aFNQAl8RM/AyPKDm2xMTZ2GokevVQD/oaF jyNNl1sr7z5c8ts5LF3FlTMKV5HGYfndQrLCfK++u70oOBTg3vosjwS/gbjiREbjDGyV PJiMlN7E6rwOF0C9IP2En3TGX9RLX1EQiBpXpn6koBqT+BTQx3mz8thPaDnPtV0Qqa1d 8drQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JkGdpZ//9lBZxMAUODOCUE0mY7mEV52+DPHTALgcXyjqcdblQ dVkpdXIomPydJ/E/kesaQGBeqy3hcPIVjn63/gPgKt189cOnvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMT6MlR8tkIsG5OSxZGw/WMNpT/nTDsFewusOMNn6vOQj9TgjF60l4KWjua9YBrvfeDs/yq3QSdoVdoT4PstY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:36a:: with SMTP id f10mr7208770vsa.52.1610642698938; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:44:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44b68dc6-ed95-c8f9-ad00-2457374b1d74@rhsoft.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:44:48 -0500 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ee2ea705b8def94a" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Abusive emails was: silly question : what is more secure at the moment, php7, php8, or plain .sh shell scripts? From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler) --000000000000ee2ea705b8def94a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Larry Garfield wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 4:29 AM, Kris Craig wrote: > > > > > > > and as explained in the past: if *you guy* ever again contact my > > > > employer asking for the law department beause you think some > bugreport > > > > written late at night with a obfuscated email was from me i will > *find > > > > and fuck* you > > > > > > Wait did somebody actually contact this troll's employer?! Seems like an > > unnecessary escalation to me. I think this may be a perfect example of > the > > timeless wisdom of the phrase, "Do not feed the trolls." > > > > Might be better to just block all of his known emails from the list. If > he > > gets around this by emailing people individually, I agree that publishing > > it here with the email address included would be useful, as it would > enable > > everyone to individually block their emails then. > > > > --Kris > > Point of order. "Don't feed the trolls" may be timeless, but there is > absolutely nothing wise about that saying. It's the "turn the other cheek > when the bully punches you in the face" advice, and it backfires horribly. > > Telling people to individually block an abusive user with many email > addresses is putting all the effort of dealing with an abuser on the > victims. That's the worst possible advice one could give. > > cf: https://peakd.com/community/@crell/why-you-can-t-just-ignore-them > > Please, for the love of all that is holy, expunge "don't feed the trolls" > from your mind. It's counter-productive and destructive advice. > > I agree with this. I'd also add that in this case, we aren't even feeding this troll. He lurks on the list and sends private replies to people. Usually those replies nitpick on something that isn't even the main point of the discussion. The only way to "not feed" this troll would be to not participate at all. > --Larry Garfield > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Chase Peeler chasepeeler@gmail.com --000000000000ee2ea705b8def94a--