Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112747 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96347 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2021 14:29:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2021 14:29:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873B8180504 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:05:53 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 06:05:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id c124so18530356wma.5 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:05:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=k+4pz8blHzgkR8ISdSfM92FMwuaaFP2Laj/U40xlfoY=; b=gF52OXYNWbBqw2EgXCJrxq5SynmHrbf8v2AEeOtX8QVllaUFiq4aTLZulzPjiOG//Y 4uS5NG/dWJ8M63bizX3+DTq0oFSY2a9JbwOI24InIj2NXEdjAHGJq1tCYECe19MJKROG S427cltG/KJiP3P1ITcLr7ZZIq3KuL/kfyv14UvC8KoZv7wsZIqaMutk8Xo+guRwmWIF qeoqJ5CrAL2FmYtqk3Bp0SUWOovqBrXDi42aydSvG9RCZ2v/dU1OgCP+gkJxeOnOR15w 4eRyJGTfaR0aPj2T3LR1nbNjmlpCmRQ1fJhOd3agD4e2sQNIFDVuTYEo5jvnJ4mkvA53 wwNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=k+4pz8blHzgkR8ISdSfM92FMwuaaFP2Laj/U40xlfoY=; b=oavHdtykcBvMEJUJqZyt+RNSYtc2EN/aDoDb2o7gj117gY6CA8HC7yO0fEsNrflCfM 4LdBrWWLQVUxmtO9L+vOQGabyQcM+FgjbfkxHFrJEEQlMXtk09dcDlC2JQhRJhykQg0n gKQn6/A3yc+B1mdZkqy5nO63z2m3Iqz3bw7sm5IKX6TtpB4jiG1+o9GRNvZboOq1ffxE CWXP66zmpWcisGdic8nP9XKZsMy/TzXENKt1GyMa+PgdmH5pGcTujdHniYTMltppn2N+ HX0r/R7/q3nwvwMowUOX5bGH+RS/RtXbniOU0VfJWVifSlecN4QFO45R3BqB+9QWvhMJ DErA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325whLFng03fXcgjDFoO/sZx1QMLfnP02+TOsomuqeiQEeu42wF WvT377+EYYraVSHOSeEmj9txuhsoskYOuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwt2/4JJQYIlkg0o+kMkOvoR69DTjc+aR7eI7XMNeeRbPcPlS3Ok15aeyH+hwp67zfEy3yFWQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:81d5:: with SMTP id c204mr26576925wmd.156.1609769150777; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (cpc104104-brig22-2-0-cust548.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.10.58.37]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s13sm75292000wra.53.2021.01.04.06.05.49 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:05:50 -0800 (PST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <8aa05350-05fc-df9d-e5d6-fa0f4feb57ba@alec.pl> <4eec7448-f7ab-9955-8c2d-68cd4f822535@gmail.com> <7d8ce2a2-8d85-4312-af22-da643faa3a7f@www.fastmail.com> <1BC8BF20-B961-4360-855B-5BB95338BB8A@newclarity.net> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:05:48 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Enumerations, Round 2 From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Tommins) On 04/01/2021 11:15, Markus Fischer wrote: > On 03.01.21 12:01, Mike Schinkel wrote: >> So in my perfect world this: >> >> enum BookingStatus { >>       case PENDING; >>       case CONFIRMED; >>       case CANCELLED; >> } >> >> Would be equivalent to: >> >> enum BookingStatus { >>       case PENDING = "PENDING"; >>       case CONFIRMED = "CONFIRMED"; >>       case CANCELLED = "CANCELLED"; >> } > > I'm with Mikes' suggesting here, see also my previous messages [1] [2]. > > I don't know how to back this up with numbers, but the way I see it > the majority of use cases will have a benefit of being able to > directly use the literal values derived from the lexical ones and the > ability to have custom values is feature next to it. I would personally be OK with this if it was allowed but opt-in, e.g. adding the ": string" would default the values in that way, or even something magic like ": auto". I'm still not a fan of having values *always* defined, because I want to be able to pick case labels without worrying about whether they make sense as values. For instance, there's a similar maintenance issue to named parameters: having a default value means if I write "case PENDING;" in v1.0, I can't change that to "case PENDING='P';" or "case PENDING=1;" in v1.1, in case somebody is relying on the value being 'PENDING', which was never intended. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]