Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112655
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <eadd4a32-a05b-463b-a91f-a5d353c577b2@www.fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <856d4f8d-e901-ba76-e421-303b7a7bc05e@fischer.name>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 09:43:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <eadd4a32-a05b-463b-a91f-a5d353c577b2@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam_score: -6.3
X-Spam_score_int: -62
X-Spam_bar: ------
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Hi, On 28.12.20 21:21, Larry Garfield wrote: > The full RFC
    is here, and I recommend reading it again in full given how much was updated.
    > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/enumerations I tried to answer the following
    question but failed to do so: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-6.3 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: php.net]
 -3.4 NICE_REPLY_A           Looks like a legit reply (A)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfE++TtCkuDsFO6T3Xf/MmiR8RWVHiLimUhwQ0FzXNYt76M5jlv4n1lwWBfVXPR+CvgVDh2DzC5wYCxpw4kuYkrqvwDsfRnLv+6OCha++2a3APztVETCh
 W054+tysRNOEzZY5FeFVZ+/RHv3o9wQPLW6aOA/mtq+q7GG+/KYmSSjT
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Enumerations, Round 2
From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer)

Hi,

On 28.12.20 21:21, Larry Garfield wrote:
> The full RFC is here, and I recommend reading it again in full given how much was updated.
> 
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/enumerations

I tried to answer the following question but failed to do so:

What is the scalar value for a ScalarEnum if none is explicitly defined?

The RFC makes this example:
 > enum Suit: string implements Colorful {
 >    case Hearts = 'H';
 >    case Diamonds = 'D';
…
 > 'D' == Suit::Diamonds->value; // true


What in this case?

 > enum Suit: string {
 >    case Hearts;
 >    case Diamonds;
…

What is the outcome of `Suit::Diamonds->value` ?

Thanks!
- Markus