Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112572 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61881 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2020 09:19:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Dec 2020 09:19:29 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B5A1804B1 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:54 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f174.google.com (mail-il1-f174.google.com [209.85.166.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-f174.google.com with SMTP id w17so1572373ilj.8 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S1qpTUfK+ihSXDg4EdPQTENAEiM4+Td9Wml/VTcq6c0=; b=tuW520gpNcFAZ2r8vvTUjpyuOhWYv27FurdJUss4jQ/rrDc9w5FGGn4MWoV7QXH5Go 105GPIYf1UztI47HleAtTHoNH0b3RIZ992nrB0cuJlZjvAqQAilZwiuGd52/8BN/dCqB srqv3xmfbwTWaAIF8hNU9/ZBUpsc5mM6MphpQcjM2H+Qfku5/ZhXDiS0IHdmI9VggPvM 3yb4qwt/tWTd2eCYokSoAp/JHEh/ZoNybviuDH3BWhZVjvhZNRi5DCP8ssaxFT7e6+n+ ZtCo9JShPtPuLTx46s/a/a9Sckbo4P1L0ek7kPpEJRHduWtTnskDlgEsDXtEirVpUmDi SaNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S1qpTUfK+ihSXDg4EdPQTENAEiM4+Td9Wml/VTcq6c0=; b=pH/nhpcjIa+C57py+fvHGUcWfmb6TF/gRmMW+STrxdklr4wVVNvNxQZcRrGKJH7BKp 05ZwFoao8OCs4OZ1nuuHRanC6p3KlwQvis98IOkufzQtMxqLb7lmph16Eg7rN132iyzd eQ7VXD1apoedLAA44+uWRkB626/UFnEEJw2P3ugd7mBVUH4VJOHEfSxNV1idoEO+WXoP WKnFzyKLOHSQCW6kTtO7BPYDKSaNP1ZHtxKZmJ+qA72Px/I2dLwGZk4SK4YVWhR2RZjw 6S8rwkx8mhpTs8yC9XLpcwGU+/uSxqZ0St45zyQhqU/Ya7TMMVd6W97kJrFy6mxnrb2r eoCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310NVr0JVicldM9bRnW+4Qguxojyb2STk9oZ9KRbFEbAEqZrpDO 2A8Cd+2ogtOM3tLER9RnC99ZY3Poc9w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmKuNkvraDEUCk3iA7sfEfUlcZFzxYZBVK2XcD66YRlf43tSfb0vkKIzuCpQOPwKGn8grkGg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1bcb:: with SMTP id x11mr14373465ilv.32.1608540709309; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-il1-f171.google.com (mail-il1-f171.google.com. [209.85.166.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m75sm13083536ill.15.2020.12.21.00.51.47 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-f171.google.com with SMTP id u12so8211133ilv.3 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a92:1f09:: with SMTP id i9mr15318407ile.288.1608540707707; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:51:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9b36af8a-270f-2796-194e-b50296522407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:51:12 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?= Cc: Rowan Tommins , PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007d684b05b6f591af" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Measuring maximum execution time based on wall-time From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --0000000000007d684b05b6f591af Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:43, M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis wrote: > Also, please > be aware that the timeout is a clean shutdown > mechanism, so shutdown handlers and the already > mentioned RSHUTDOWN functions are triggered. On the other hand, fpm's > timeout doesn't invoke any of them. > Tangentially, can this be considered a bug in FPM's handling? I appreciate the speed boost FPM brought over CGI, but the more I work with it the less I like the way it functions (but that is a separate conversation). Peter --0000000000007d684b05b6f591af--