Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112511
Return-Path: <paul.crovella@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 75001 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2020 00:47:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2020 00:47:16 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472E6180504
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:18:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <paul.crovella@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com (mail-ot1-f46.google.com [209.85.210.46])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id j20so13196981otq.5
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:18:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=gAX0YD1G0eMOojf4EzKXpkydMKKHCKklH4OeAmjk8Eo=;
        b=QiI3pAHM/5OId48qFa9/s+HsZOzQqsqoLcirZt0aoCtZMZ6ClXTSRnEvRSYxpLyqZz
         wlV5NBwcpuzolnLfvcGnXEPSbxV4X5zBLr5q3bhCJZ6hXRPXYkBuehrYdadWuxdOiMPi
         PQ/a0mhUwdKVkUa40rcGvvSA6NnBb1DuLEzBLIJCNn3IhID6aZFHh3Wj1Dy8KmFMygJJ
         0zrV42g7MLenIgRZa1jx6vUZKtD0wFdXSaYLLN3FM9P/+aQ1NN0xTTpqAgZQ/Z1d/SP5
         QnXQWo+qZ8RO3ptqt+M2wDk1+pnYkIDq3/ILJRXIlSsZOrYvk4OVKnqlvdVkkOOfZ5uI
         Pr0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=gAX0YD1G0eMOojf4EzKXpkydMKKHCKklH4OeAmjk8Eo=;
        b=nCZ28eG/MzDPtx2MeLd/DWgL0XNcpwvmWc0yt2T6ZYw0zyZKFIFCV4f/aPEx71rT25
         DA7Nsuz0wSeM3EPuEKgIlf1nftuXiHTP3fICPStKOE6kAQzusWlQGGpYH1sUzZWhciSk
         ZNLl5u6uVHgn4IBXtBpn1g4/vcxl23wsiRP0IhP3waaBEsCXXtRbaAaFNR2OzIxUoroj
         AxD9+cOUZNwIvMAhYiolWf9Ns2Q/r9wanEBSlH9nLDnQRzx+QiNfw1mV8WUgrHEzYMOP
         yuwMSIOw0NmYIvjTx0wp8ERtWJh+T+GX7rc2uK4ZqBD0QMdsek4f9YuAEY4rTIA00Kky
         i+dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BrA6BylvVocZZX6C5dGWo23LlNWwfn8g+rGhfsWvy8xt2d7N6
	6llyLSVo6a4szVcAMhafBId0nmI5/ZZpzE4pfw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6lEH6bDrkcsnHhY+bJBBy8I4m3RwgS2Z2oGW6HqCAWnQTEzjgkdgdccE1Cn+nr+2/nE+qnQLe+cSN7Cj1N1I=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:22eb:: with SMTP id t11mr22511351otc.114.1607991483233;
 Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:18:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c_8Z389ZA2725QDT0bx8sTfaeh4jXRs02E6GZy83pXkVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <283eb44a-d6f9-b91b-115e-cc95e9523c30@telia.com> <CAF+90c_7oO6LpkUrOCOZez210a8E+fbm_S3aVTpDTqm6SXN=Gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6fed4bf0-fa17-c5b5-509f-631e561af037@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fed4bf0-fa17-c5b5-509f-631e561af037@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:17:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN2symi42CY-nEStSd=4g-g49PgevZ=1qtnwATDmiqSnPE4P8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Larsson?= <bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Phasing out Serializable
From: paul.crovella@gmail.com (Paul Crovella)

> an RFC that mandates what should happen in 10.0, maybe
> 10 years into the future feels a bit farfetched.

It's more of a default unless another RFC changes the plan rather than
a mandate. Given the plan here it seems a reasonable default.