Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112498 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29432 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2020 18:43:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2020 18:43:18 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9941804C9 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:14:02 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (mail-il1-f173.google.com [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 2so16681206ilg.9 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:14:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YsVZ8x2BoJg0NI3+tzfMIqBm79FlJxfe0m2z4Fsd1Ys=; b=qPtPtkZQbZ9ezryEWOtAMllLOUFkb/lrXHgh0V3YMSzdg/t/degVkIlrzsLycV+Y5r SWZMJn2kIvb17e5Kviw5vAUm2xbj0pH5qUNyKRAb/R7WlUktk/sHklbaRaAh+Cs1ncRJ fWMDk+FlzG3Y95NArbe9LBeoXGQbvr7Zh7pTyFS7l/yNv5Xn5izyBd9e/XBjAwziO2mg VU79eYqis4vtYAMNhWQyJw3djz/b9PiqiWBzX3xyLGMvL/QYKUEXoFi52e+61cTAkbyE VaFU3EXdjWF8D2qfaRI16VrTfxAD1p2Ag4GxbfChRQxGEtD60Hl/YX10G7yyI8gQZRiP 9oGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YsVZ8x2BoJg0NI3+tzfMIqBm79FlJxfe0m2z4Fsd1Ys=; b=IpDmLP0ROjwXrQWgeJihGI0VlGG5vyI98Zd4Q8Ak2MOqM1luHLRw07c7QCdOLlHfR/ QTeOv1wnNUJlPdR2Ftsre8ykIOQIXltk/Z3OqC/PoO0vnk+x2TgPLXOKOt2RnsN6g9r+ ko9q5FaJiJdO3FXnNNIJWCCUbm0mBMBkpVQ2xHkCnyIVYUKEwZA1bqctNO3AXLd/Gkhh 0w15KmJvKinN5n78gQg/sTZoVp6N6HZsXZuHYuQl7ZbRPjeLzbbwIeeMaDszWTZhedSi hNi5dFTyRAfQU9yqK7UWnANvKOi66WBxCMf7bqv8IW6jZPK6fOou3gwshmEo/6mmGEbc pqAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Trs7Exm4taZemsOeo4dPDl6aYVBkngmAUGVb2g2EuZd7hQKGB KPoSnslZk9oaBWauFB36CEg/5L937fY9AsIyDXnPoyAMrbQi5AQ7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLwPmC/CxEHtOPRi3Pu1jFTgkgc8bUg7dnwH16op2+tg8jnpB5EHK7bXoJRtb1L6WVPggK1g0phCYbjcOR+os= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c26c:: with SMTP id h12mr30365076ild.165.1607969641586; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:14:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:13:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004be47d05b6709b11" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Short-match From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --0000000000004be47d05b6709b11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hey Larry, On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:34 PM Larry Garfield wrote: > I present to Internals this tiny RFC to follow up on the match() > expression RFC from earlier in the year. There was solidly positive > support for this shortcut previously but it was removed for simplicity at > the time, with the intent to bring it back later. It's now later. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-match > Overall back to the `switch (true)` case, which IMO is not a good idea in first place :| Nothing wrong with using a set of conditional that are put in a sequence through `if ()`, for these rare cases. Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/ --0000000000004be47d05b6709b11--