Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112228 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82679 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2020 19:53:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2020 19:53:49 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A289C1804C0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:16:16 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-mahalux.mvorisek.com (mail-mahalux.mvorisek.com [77.93.195.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from 68b3cd83a735 (10.228.0.227) by mail-mahalux.mvorisek.com (10.228.0.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:16:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_955c5872aa2462221b0ecbed2e9c53a6" Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:16:12 +0100 To: PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0d81655d1941f16abd80daaa8442774666b9f0f7e2b63f69cecedb08ac8b0779@mahalux.com> X-Mailer: SAP NetWeaver 7.03 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Draft - Closure self reference From: vorismi3@fel.cvut.cz (=?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Vo=C5=99=C3=AD=C5=A1ek_-_=C4=8CVUT_FEL?=) --=_955c5872aa2462221b0ecbed2e9c53a6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Hi everyone, maybe a bad idea, but what about addressing the "Principle of least astonishment" issue by allowing to specify/capture the variable after the function is assigned: $f = function () use ($f) {...}; With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / S přátelským pozdravem, Michael Voříšek On 10 Nov 2020 18:08, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > Hello internals, > > For reasons, I was reviewing the conversation where adding closures to > PHP was added, and it reminded me that currently the only way for a > closure to call itself is slightly terribly, so I drafted an RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closure_self_reference > > Before I spend time on it, is there any strong reason why this is a bad idea? > > cheers > Dan > Ack --=_955c5872aa2462221b0ecbed2e9c53a6--