Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:112070 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67113 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2020 05:20:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2020 05:20:28 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADB71804CC for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id m20so1059722ljj.5 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WAY5+/BDj5y6MGKv0l5PGWPEd9sFVs9vdI67OmzQDRA=; b=dCnMnJtLoRNImIYKLnMIq5fPogVu15Cqu/Pm7NqKIN3YhGufofanRP4TineUwX8we8 daLGypSytxIV5e4TNZYyDJ+fFGuloBFE/1ZJMxXw0eBHrDCQH8F4TcddorxPPxpBlNqZ q6ro8TcXVQ/3POq+aGvIJrDoKon3m1wfnfmkjWZ+5SvPtgByAxVtEIIR7Iwx1r9WEM6j uV73Z8EMKEdjWOiKsR73qDzPJGPRemLRX9fOph5MatjJ1N7B3FuNisUuoUZe5uzFYVti RiQH7QWoPl8c1fwI7YWQgmc/357tDhX7yij+3UXbd38y+04INZ36YF3ME6QxJozoP/zQ FieQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533U6s7xXRhhHD72D2KBNIYWJIA+mm4TL5s+A7thYRIsLrFr4JIp TVxtzRi9cFUb5CA0GZX8GKeLXR4j+U8qhwQGHekyRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2kW4BvDF0gybmhcVTveFHmblQObAnDGzIn79ixWX3jVyi/ilMP4ECJJFEgf1MslYJiFmv8zfBV8hG2PzIeGs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f13:: with SMTP id u19mr713827ljk.160.1602822974612; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:36:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:36:03 -0500 Message-ID: To: Benjamin Eberlei , Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Internals , Roman Pronskiy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000a36f105b1c24e7d" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 8 release announcement page on php.net From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --0000000000000a36f105b1c24e7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:25 AM Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > > 1. October: RMs and/or php-web maintainers should give their go on the idea > (someone else?), so that more detailed creative time investment is not > going to waste. FTR they came to Gabriel and I *first*. Sounded like a neat idea to both of us, but I explicitly deferred them to internals@lists.php.net* as that's not up to whoever happens to be RM for that release. It's something for all of us to agree (or disagree) on. On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:32 AM Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > Also note that anything related to the websites belong to the > php-webmaster@ mailing list, *not* internals and I would highly > recommend moving the thread there. > I sent them here rather than php-webmaster@ because that list is noisier than a Rhino in a wind chime factory. You might well have been the only person to notice it had it gone there. On the rest of your response, I agree. PHP has long held neutrality and there's no good reason to start playing favorites now. That said, I think it might be reasonable to invite *any* (or perhaps, "any with at least X many Ys" -- criteria TBD) framework/app/project to provide their own stats (relative changes only, no claims on absolute "speed" relative to each other). We already allow conferences to submit NEWS items that go on the front page. Inviting claims (with disclaimers?) from PHP adjacent projects isn't a massive leap from there. As for the "community leaders" section... I hadn't even noticed that on first review. The name of that is even a little gross and presumptive. I'd probably just toss that one out. With projects, we can at the very least put a requirement that it must be FOSS. That doesn't work in this section nearly so well. -Sara --0000000000000a36f105b1c24e7d--