Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111793
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2868e0ed4e7ebc09b568471c913079516f93fd2fc95e97b0ffea192db1e04275@mahalux.com>
In-Reply-To: <2868e0ed4e7ebc09b568471c913079516f93fd2fc95e97b0ffea192db1e04275@mahalux.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:10:55 -0300
Message-ID: <CAEsg9X1_RkAFOKr+PPSesJEdwnbB55LuAfE8_HgGw5_cC1irvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBWb8WZw63FoWVrIC0gxIxWVVQgRkVM?= <vorismi3@fel.cvut.cz>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000a9e7b05ae596603"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Pass source object to clone like __clone($origThis)
From: david.proweb@gmail.com (David Rodrigues)

--0000000000000a9e7b05ae596603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I understand... seems that `$this` is very confusing inside `__clone()`:
when writing, it writes to the clone, when reading it reads from original.

Seems valid a new optional parameter definition with the original source.



Atenciosamente,
David Rodrigues


Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 =C3=A0s 15:41, Michael Vo=C5=99=C3=AD=C5=A1ek - =
=C4=8CVUT FEL <
vorismi3@fel.cvut.cz> escreveu:

> Hi, please look at
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63675888/get-original-source-instance=
-in-clone
>
>
> do you have anything against updating PHP to pass "instance before
> cloned" to any __clone call from php?
>
> no BC - user may accept this extra argument or declare function
> __clone() without any param like now
>
> With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen / S p=C5=99=C3=A1te=
lsk=C3=BDm pozdravem,
>
> Michael Vo=C5=99=C3=AD=C5=A1ek

--0000000000000a9e7b05ae596603--