Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111708 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88219 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2020 18:18:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2020 18:18:33 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9900B1804D9 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:22:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam08olkn2064.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.47.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=RLnB7PyEGmvDmNkaXEcY5yc630RGs9zMv/+8KlT9+QxDmldYxwjoC95RI6HXS31IT537joTUXUSnThMksay0MjLWdFefavRxmJ47aOcxTu6Qtvs1Ef4aeyfGVmGpyvt0SETRNCT+Sto1HUbuQCiVpTG11JmtP7hWaA1+AxLxPAClvi0gZ/cRrChWDUbkMkD46tmri1172+t/owc+xlA1bj9kprjJF4ODUczU4sPeLMcFArrqVjV+X75ebw5Qdhfddm5Axfk8+wdKdHgKD9x4lD2z+ooiNGtlf5Lw0W8QSwIb4jDR42Bz8bMnLG1l0tUBkyg0Xsf2bU+l8dTg4pyg3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JdVB1rfG9BXGYtteCYSZhPgcQo0tAypYlseqnVfFi2A=; b=kGSy+p/tEhjgcGjTcR6OQ4TsODLhuQcBy7+tB9Z9xBoE5vNQSBX0Wkybu/Wek7IlykE4yLeGrvulfHlfnjuZdBZwCMJp29p5f8PPu+LAOHWkeBNtFpF7WoQK3qdJvVQ5tX83/HuZn23sGG7peWtVwcMZwaHntKbvcJgQ3u8l1gp6nHmaxx3Mq9IiSzGf91E8fKToY/K3T8iGH+nVNcwzd470jftD561SF+hOK8J9T4i7twRP4AH1kQCn+KY+ly3YgTAiTF0ZEDoyHdGJ3/2FuVbQs3VGJGK1yoZJSpTepqbXy/IA5PmgZSrf6LVDEsAn2WeEI2womRB2s/dkmw3Vcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JdVB1rfG9BXGYtteCYSZhPgcQo0tAypYlseqnVfFi2A=; b=PtzJfAqhlFbUpXCjjA0ezK5Fxqptx8fzWP3zeeawZIE7VRl5THPpQfmal6UU86wT1vXICjyOPpPlI7Wp6awWHaxJR043njPygWymvrL8u4i7OddsSJSaKLFzN5vwZkTA1EvuIRXYpWhq8EvUcSBbUzl1DQ9umJRiwJUwGQrqto8mreicddpBodCTqmi+6p2jIWSOB1nEEdjFI3SNK6TJKD9d5Ws0vrXzORW6P6FUke9BpPW1IK8qW03IG5WEG5kDUww0XLvnSZQ3blXcEr98vqhE2g6P+dTjY3V6MkUQZfLhOMWrir08sIoAx6vFvCd0Vbl+HpRtEOVGANKs1qBVdg== Received: from SN1NAM04FT033.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.54) by SN1NAM04HT082.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.89.187) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.21; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:22:26 +0000 Received: from DM6PR07MB6618.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::52) by SN1NAM04FT033.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:22:26 +0000 Received: from DM6PR07MB6618.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f9d1:ed5b:8625:bfb4]) by DM6PR07MB6618.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f9d1:ed5b:8625:bfb4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3326.023; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:22:26 +0000 To: Ilija Tovilo , PHP internals Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Re: Should hash comments be deprecated? Thread-Index: AQHWd9/i7uMAZC0X8UefGA07rPcslqlDEEFugAxLBmk= Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:22:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5f4037e3.1c69fb81.e0b66.dcd6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US Content-Language: en-CA X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:8DA4C9084A2E214F1C0019A266B5D9FFC5160EF1E6BDDC6797A7C0C8035F8D49;UpperCasedChecksum:3032AECA4403DCA9BC579AB41B4C226BB56F6373997D586DD4626E1D029752AF;SizeAsReceived:7252;Count:44 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [zr1Ej6TQYj6FhO0RHlZbcG/qn3BsCz0d3OnbKL1aW1rp3LhCRTwU5KmeE/PCGHXC] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 44 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f98e59ae-b8ac-45ca-359f-08d84c4019cd x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM04HT082: x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 3+ZstI9EwhmuhzhLXOWbWJ+XRh3lkJv6olGftGFu/4Ifed7ilKf0nfe2ytB3AFJPVmH96FOOW4NDXSK+eC1DJpqekInIRmH5+zT6B7WtIz+h8Jow5+046UAjdUbgUbI71wqTcquHHFBRNFqruqGoIoa7EXTZomTILt1J1PXYrIuYXHlWmbMGNCsuYQCNqDYLPFCP6E6CGiYr4Qh5ZZf6xA== x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: g5GCMgmtf1NpGHwWFEpvt2z8FPNoSAw2vzW/AjEtf5aeAPROGNOE7MfWST5rERhsGtiM97WSF+35Zr3UF5Vs3FonGqQwW9XeFJUZwCeGxe55n83T2Q71PMcHedBkjNIQ9tT7WZdkOXcsy4Sbhq2g1GawK8MLc8nbS+rgoa/S1+s7YyvPOntkSgfCmSktOSRI9HPPNI95G+GvtZgqQxnEgQ== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1NAM04FT033.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f98e59ae-b8ac-45ca-359f-08d84c4019cd X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Aug 2020 17:22:26.6602 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM04HT082 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Should hash comments be deprecated? From: tysonandre775@hotmail.com (tyson andre) Hi internals,=0A= =0A= If it turns out that the impact on legacy applications, legacy libraries, o= r holding back upgrades is a concern for others=0A= (I'm not sure what the most common opinion is),=0A= another option would be a system ini setting=0A= =0A= `hash_comment =3D 0|1|2`=0A= 0 - disable `#comment` support completely when parsing/lexing - throw a Par= seError while lexing and return T_ERROR in token_get_all=0A= 1 - (default) emit a compilation warning or deprecation notice when parsing= files mentioning that hash comments will be removed in a future major rele= ase. Do this only for the first comment.=0A= 2 - allow it silently (possibly an unnecessary option to provide)=0A= =0A= Then, this could be gradually strictened=0A= =0A= - Forbid option 2 in php 8.x=0A= - change the default ini setting value to 0 in 8.x or 9.0=0A= - Add a configuration setting in php 8.x or 9.x to always disable hash comm= ents=0A= - Remove support =0A= =0A= >=A0Correct me if I'm wrong, but the shebang goes before the PHP opening=0A= > tag special case.=0A= =0A= Yes, shebang can only be parsed on the first line of a script - before `