Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111673 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1743 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2020 20:41:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2020 20:41:20 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61F4180511 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pg1-f178.google.com (mail-pg1-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-f178.google.com with SMTP id g33so1473985pgb.4 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CHfOgsGKc++z7ev7OdscUG5jdka9lyxEmgqjxUuD9Iw=; b=tQwvH30Wojr03G+twvrhLsv2Katbo/HUtQdIV61idorbN4+XuJp9s5eq4fbL73vv45 XhFmkVbxQ7eoy2o3hrHQ98JNs777N0WTHhbG2ZpMTpMwrwA27G8fQxH7wi7f+EP+ahBO N3Vqmh3OqCi/yTzeDdP7eGO6WvUESEl/XrFFGwoA7hLanpOjtC4tJ5xaXLbcOnO/zzP1 J+HOLYIV/jKMUOnHXzBbGA2jlXZk83qLARxtQqGQ3qSDkuP4QteyUELZFkaJUazkXMHh NSrMGzJIgFu98NDRBIaw5lDbRwhuAbKYTSchQxkg7QJT0GEbiTYV7fbZXWBBJl+Yxx/m Y+LA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CHfOgsGKc++z7ev7OdscUG5jdka9lyxEmgqjxUuD9Iw=; b=c8uDlNgWQYGjQiUJsP9HIHeE08hRwnTcY9hY+h5l/W6Kv5bKsf2K+RkUvT1md449TG 0Fe3Eda1IKKRu74rzmP5nF++1pN8RFgptmnSau4cVyaTDIcsqXTuiOUTcI6I9/TLPmvn 6Ig9wcrn4ALB9aLJ24WYcEQUfHEaBSma78xY45RN2qAFn+AFXfI0/8NMp9aRy7oJNo8q N0TyUEj1AaR/EB3EsBIDfcLAluMcfYf35yz4pLqFDB788DG/qH6PbeN+mLxkIYVBs9pT QN4ikBok/4uQEw7N9SpXfvD6QTYRBH9DZcIZMA5TxOy83xyOJj9C9qB1oNcqbVI/UZUO C++Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531TSllK4A4+tJBRU+zbeyvlDdCVgluwyaOvt3Vpoy50X3PMBUGn QrInsLs1G2ls6ciSlONXKAAmFYMo0AmY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx10xbgryQWEq0qjTfir+5rnfpEZYMdR0dgawGNSiPUm70TK35mrw2nkRZm89pYWYnnxiQJVQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9107:: with SMTP id 7mr3692636pfh.323.1598038997516; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Stas-Mac-3.local (ec2-34-209-88-149.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [34.209.88.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hg7sm2616332pjb.24.2020.08.21.12.43.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT) To: Brent Roose Cc: PHP Internals References: <4d9d8746-95b3-6afe-8270-f3b7097f143a@gmail.com> <4CB670BF-631C-4113-A71D-700975B58EFB@stitcher.io> Message-ID: <09800ca9-630e-bd30-dfae-94305b1b9e41@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:43:15 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CB670BF-631C-4113-A71D-700975B58EFB@stitcher.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Community vote on RFCs From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > How many people have voting rights? Over 200 if I'm not mistaken? How > many of those have been activly contributing to PHP for over the past > year? I think that's a better question to answer. If half of those > people's voting rights get revoked then maybe there's room to allow a > few more key community figures to participate? There's no reason to. If these people don't contribute and don't vote - so what? There's no limited pool of votes that needs to be distributed, and as I said before, the reason for getting a vote is not passing some kind of representation quota. If the person contributes substantially, they should have a vote, regardless of how many or few inactive voters are there. If they are not the part of the contributing team, they are free to voice their opinion, which will be listened to, but they won't be a part of the binding vote process. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com