Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111656 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49831 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2020 14:28:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2020 14:28:02 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121031804DB for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:29:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-yb1-f182.google.com (mail-yb1-f182.google.com [209.85.219.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f182.google.com with SMTP id x10so1095070ybj.13 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V9euKQJslgjE8Ujpg3Hd7PoZXFaxv+ecRCwCbw7AIRI=; b=FLzszfIgBLOQpcuNIU2CW1LuOXlIZkERyBicZYrfGCzR16a1He3L0fAt5tuiXUr94P t8bJz0qI4n0uy+GpdwamWK5W/3vOJxLij5TJpMXgsnb7CXBOOQAnhIl/fjz84h5bfuGS rQCewbbyK4zfGeSIbOy2FkgeaMeaTUWAmvYy0RQG7WEy2Amh+juWkyvibmpkhv+D1oi2 4cjxd3Z+0kSI+whm7v4B1ifmGkDTdFTjVfqaDXa6yUOGx6WCLn/1DONA6rgV6Fthp0F7 U36Kj1V99IE5DwYk07SuSqNd4SwMdfpsrxtaVvUY8dPZf4tHvSihL5IRLQW3lTqmo7O9 vMzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V9euKQJslgjE8Ujpg3Hd7PoZXFaxv+ecRCwCbw7AIRI=; b=YSZVRf8j3ATbDihNhy1XttZz6QLIJsx02v57ftaWVNkK7sMBt9UgI69IMstevqm1G5 eKY5VZR9vtx8IPmps16S8miuuQnXJ209AAN+XZZwmMnLm+lENJLPyPNMdNzzR0//H31B iXMTlUuBzwIckKnuNN5WXtPtAR7M4KUMg6sqJVNzwhZJtDS7fMfQBS6A3oRUTBAOZnkW yrvviYbCqrTrcC01uqe2ATKsG9HPiPNhyy8YNm/vBVgfPk+zOHL4vT1hbxlOU1vvwHcJ R2ErfjRBFtRij35KHE5EoDLGClTmNcr6WprU1OzJp3nHtfTay93ouN6Ez5b2AJ/wNpu7 cy5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ro7pRIp9a0PildD51s8V+UCcFRe0jHX2ptRhBnzPa10cWTWjr fMHeG96NA0rn0astRG53anSm6q5uDaZkHglbsLU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCgvlrZU4+oXdJl9WOZ3XXYKESG7ybLt5fvxcqYAtcM4s/tVonEhThW+ihqwv0gKTdsVsyme4bT4nthDKBFa8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:cb49:: with SMTP id b70mr4302446ybg.361.1597930180596; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:29:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6cfb77d4d511b5c591e7d7b5cc80199955123b2cd4276a5bca2327e4b02942db@mahalux.com> <4a6d97c1-28e8-c6cb-e985-d32c5d056ec0@telia.com> <6580abc6e6d8d73f1722d3070ec5214c7d0ba13759b97c60eacf57cfbfae50ab@mahalux.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:29:29 +0200 Message-ID: To: Gabriel Caruso Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFlbCBWb8WZw63FoWVrIC0gxIxWVVQgRkVM?= , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca56c305ad4f1c55" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allow sleep() to accept non-integer values From: kocsismate90@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?=) --000000000000ca56c305ad4f1c55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Again, I personally don't understand why this could bypass the RFC > > process, as multiple people have already, me included, voiced their > > disagreement with this change. > > > > This was proposed by Nikita Popov in his comment > > > > Nikita is just one of the members. If other members want an RFC, we need > it. > > Also, the PR has a couple of :-1: votes as well, which indicates that an > RFC is necessary. > Just for clarity, Nikita didn't propose such thing that the feature can skip the RFC process. The exact words he used is the following: This does not necessarily need an RFC, but needs a discussion on the > mailing list at least, as the reception here seems somewhat negative. Default target version is > 8.1 now, though exceptions can be made for small features. All this means is: - The discussion on the ML is a must - IPHP 8.1 is the default target Regards: M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 --000000000000ca56c305ad4f1c55--