Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111641 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61020 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2020 23:48:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2020 23:48:47 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3413B1804AA for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:50:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a14so291581wra.5 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:50:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tk7VK94M+KTRuXgiqNUxeySprTMTFZPSpwT1jvPoDBc=; b=se4SWk4kkM0LkfA6s51tgfdzBprLeN90cpumaph4D6kFuhSyHPHDN2UkTA/s6yXBXT gLMDUQWRwr78V7pCbnjA1BSG/cPQIz7Tq4HFXWpPy/14ne/9xwcca59mmFtCdfe9o2qd nuKKkumVOnjzk4KZo9UdP40J2dUoiabq87yJq4aEHlv3w3IOFY9r/buuOn2N1rUJkZ+g +it2qacFGQUmFtB/olczMd4kQfdIce3OphVCCAkM3SNviB5CYZgAAhcjnWBnI9WwzoVF 7byz/Lb/1pFG3oUKa1UIdKrZIz7de8n5aXL4NNXgGJTxrMdzbyJV1l7e92S4FhbMhFSz b9HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tk7VK94M+KTRuXgiqNUxeySprTMTFZPSpwT1jvPoDBc=; b=jeb4BGhLprbA9e5Hj5yuptGTtZ1FtBj4+1QqeDlOmrcDVbC61bdUSou0l2HP6dxK8Y iyDssn7MxbviqD8lcwGFeHr2AGhiZ+8rUecoqBDsjscikidjbWVpu5Ik4nWw9vcGJMvx 9p6BjtZ3S6xrMV0BZSUnciC7ZD9izx3H+Ck390oQbYVAnpv8H8znGlj3a6TA5oHQLoA6 K/jXEih3Q80SrYMA0OusfaUrOOPR2a/MKmvkjBe+8I21Oy6n+zKGy4MzHD8xy/6qSIVg IuXZHLEeHMxWOyQvH02G/xq9h0jpe31LQkuAdFmrY2lNRf3bms8G8hGg7DU4UWYtVm1H pLMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+E3Fu+uQGR09Lg4dLUT1JbylgBBduEbCYcK4Kar8AlsNWvukk oISQQ05PjCzaBD0zpwDNTYy6y/EvsXq4tUAdCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+QBYR5IOdkVV2rKgeA7KM0SExFtO0MQikza8vsEqHsb5HbLBX03ptFk5zEEEo2rotLC9+mDRyltSdZKhzraY= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe0a:: with SMTP id n10mr223958wrr.125.1597877414645; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:50:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:50:03 -0700 Message-ID: To: Benjamin Morel Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Community vote on RFCs From: paul.crovella@gmail.com (Paul Crovella) On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:35 PM Benjamin Morel wrote: > > Hi Paul! > > I'm writing off list to avoid polluting the thread too much. I'm writing on list because it's weird that you call this pollution. > Could you please care to explain your negative reaction to this proposal? > > Kind regards, > Benjamin You're asking for useless, no-effort feedback in the form of votes from people who have no actual involvement in the ongoing development or maintenance of the project, so that's what I gave you. That you felt compelled to ask me about it highlights this significant shortcoming of the proposal. > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 00:27, Paul Crovella wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:28 PM Benjamin Morel wrote: >> > >> > Hi internals, >> > >> > The heated debate about attribute syntax made me think once again that it >> > would be valuable to get feedback in the form of votes from the community, >> > not just from core developers, on RFCs under discussion. >> > >> > Understandably, the RFC voting process needs to be restricted to carefully >> > selected people, mostly core developers. But the fact is, this process is a >> > bit elitist, and fails to represent the community as a whole. A recent >> > thread showed that even very active >> > contributors to OSS are unlikely to ever get a vote. >> > >> > A project being nothing without its users, it would be nice to know whether >> > an important change will make them happy or not. >> > >> > Therefore, I have in mind to develop (time permitting) an experimental >> > tool, external to the PHP wiki, that would replicate the voting options of >> > each RFC, but would allow everyone with a GitHub account to vote on the >> > same options as the original RFC. While the vote results would not directly >> > affect the wiki's vote results, I guess that this community feedback could >> > be taken into consideration by wiki voters and help them make an informed >> > decision. >> > >> > To be useful, a link to the community voting site would need to be present >> > in each RFC, ideally some time before the actual voting starts on the wiki. >> > >> > If popular enough, this tool could offer some analysis capabilities, such >> > as "what's the vote results from people having at least 100 commits to the >> > top 1000 packagist projects in the last year?" to help filter out the noise. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Benjamin