Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111640
Message-ID: <C86336C9-E94A-49FB-B27B-7EE9ADC49E33@benramsey.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2356A83-6879-46B8-8E65-6F1F6A9D25F0";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 17:35:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <559C7705-BA56-42AC-B0B7-7BB729EC2082@benramsey.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
To: Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>
References: <CAG9XoMQGmUQjSOy=8YGAmnKgmCfrTCTkGpAxLN4tsqfY72ev1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <50F88AC4-1BCB-4D74-971E-DA4CA3D887E6@benramsey.com>
 <CAG9XoMQDHyemApsyXNYK084SJyGfYhO=cMeBrUsPLRVMYDfKuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <559C7705-BA56-42AC-B0B7-7BB729EC2082@benramsey.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Community vote on RFCs
From: ben@benramsey.com (Ben Ramsey)

--Apple-Mail=_E2356A83-6879-46B8-8E65-6F1F6A9D25F0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

> On Aug 19, 2020, at 17:33, Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Aug 19, 2020, at 17:19, Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>> There=E2=80=99s nothing stopping anyone from doing this right now. =
:-)
>>=20
>> Actually there is: without a link to the poll in the RFC itself, the =
poll would probably not get enough visibility to be useful.
>=20
>=20
> I don=E2=80=99t think the RFC should include a link to the poll. This =
makes the poll an official artifact of the PHP project.
>=20
> I do think you should link to the poll in the discussion thread for =
the RFC on internals. This way, voters can use it as information to =
inform their decision. RFC authors can also take the information into =
account to discuss certain topics in an RFC they may have overlooked or =
left out.


To be clear, this kind of feedback needs to take place during the =
discussion period. A poll that takes place during the voting period =
can=E2=80=99t have any impact on the direction of the RFC.

Cheers,
Ben


--Apple-Mail=_E2356A83-6879-46B8-8E65-6F1F6A9D25F0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEAREIAB0WIQToXQMR3fpbrPOmEOewLZeYnIwHGwUCXz2pKQAKCRCwLZeYnIwH
G4JYAP9zcmXroPDApuh0RPErGJiJuTwqorTwJ+b0q8PvY9fUqgD/ZHaO1ugFIGmW
RU+9iD7On6fCArU3JN+MDmZrKW1C3sc=
=dQav
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_E2356A83-6879-46B8-8E65-6F1F6A9D25F0--