Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111571 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22671 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2020 09:17:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Aug 2020 09:17:22 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CAE18053D for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (mail-il1-f173.google.com [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id q14so10327205ilm.2 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BP8KSuSOmYgKMX4gfklvkYfYBDmqgFpcit14sQPGRko=; b=TnHaHESkOMwlrdS0ZrGDinRpfL7cetUlQXkH+sJx3MNsYnkmEz/2m6mucNUIkWSfXx /krhBauOV54URZj5S+26FkqhBhTeX7a3j2spxRs9eQ/jq9eWpQFSpEqjDIlQ7N5LLE0p JSE85lVwTXgGObhtE5ahBrV7ofJDB0LbBU/Q5ufpnVpR06vKCE8S9szVb2u8KO8z2+2H OBh1/dunpsgAYq6JkSOoRMc971g7w6cbfItzdMoo4oNzUbEUYwyC9p6Yrm4D089J45Oi zI0jPvvtmPXHAXMmi99qqXq55EbJnexJYKBcjbIlEaGnciuyo1dK9e0k//grrBAnSlYb t77A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BP8KSuSOmYgKMX4gfklvkYfYBDmqgFpcit14sQPGRko=; b=AgGexjh/DUl+7M07EdLVUrxwPWvb4x7doMkpPbGhMTGOfutW576VQjQVrfy2/lF3Db PeqrB3JqSi3y/naMzrccp3zCBnytrUN8JMxoGTkdYz3gAjkIthBArguPNl9cN3dfVf/p 3xAQF0dpucj4eJJsXkF6OODBYhvVJHLbuoijrp+D91B+MQ7zmqt0in42yZqlSYcNah0l nPGpFEWxwRnaoF8XhUR7M6wuDLljsAhKEzMWxreEOx7TQek+M+k1q3zJzAazhLth6V8a O37Z8FniRPIcWFdyA0hZtxqZdQUa1oStxq+lqfheejAugTny6AWXWnQPMAzxDmXUBCEP umdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qB4+kUqQlChOHr4e8YmBT1aSbBIRvZqY2WpldpdEUbHYGFL5w wb3Qns6PhlrIl+RFHbuppL2zYeffD9A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPnuTKiFny3hzyXEUexDyFAGdeUf6b4tK3Uv6nzp4pvsSUHbh9AQQhF05Cj3vHPMR15N/4pA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:e8d:: with SMTP id t13mr12549899ilj.211.1597652290763; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com. [209.85.166.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t187sm8583902iof.54.2020.08.17.01.18.10 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id a5so16674001ioa.13 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e603:: with SMTP id g3mr11387260ioh.180.1597652290102; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:17:34 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Benjamin Eberlei Cc: Derick Rethans , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a07a005ad0e69fc" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --0000000000003a07a005ad0e69fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 10:29, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > We have updated the RFC at > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax_change with what we > think > covers all the discussion and arguments made in this and the previous > mailing list threads. > Thank you for putting in the work it took to revise the RFC. It's good. I now understand what the delimiters achieve. While I don't agree with the first point in "Forcing @@ Attributes to end with parenthesis does not solve issues" (in this new syntax I'd ban whitespace) I appreciate the point you are making, and it is sensible for consistency. I feel grep'ability has been played down, as unless @@ MyProject\FooAttr is allowed (which isn't shown in the codeblock), then it's easier to grep for @@.+?Foo and know you have a chance of an accurate match (assuming renaming is not used) than it is with the delimiter syntax. > Sorry to everyone for causing this hazzle. > These things happen. Thank you for taking on-board the feedback and working on the RFC. Peter --0000000000003a07a005ad0e69fc--