Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111463 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46264 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2020 14:16:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2020 14:16:01 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91ECC1804AC for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f179.google.com (mail-il1-f179.google.com [209.85.166.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f179.google.com with SMTP id c6so10498561ilo.13 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+XRGHpxWhQWBCONazyPux1wCTg8262dE+Dv4VAomvfE=; b=DaXWctgXjvB8PGG2Kpxi+6zAdh0pDf0BZSEMGePo5OmsktCYZAM6w+tbM9ECMPQYHN RrHd/V/dWZSRt5svaTTMl/BduqD3aL8KCvimGrEGjQKQyN2m5dVPucXnlUPRYgyab2ch QEqcUyrOUVIN/NAXDdZZmZAVPleitgg9StyC35Vg4oaJlnnjtKKpPeixun/fnzgjh6CX Ig6O0ui8HU7Tli4Gt+ZFMk07Xv4ixHHfIuehEklhUxzQogVabRmOI2WMYXee+uU0KREn cOL6JAN7kyn+TjR7rXYAHo3a8kstUTNUdodPpnl66wCmA4Ghe5oCMRLM+IsIPfy+hdiN rwhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+XRGHpxWhQWBCONazyPux1wCTg8262dE+Dv4VAomvfE=; b=KQO7ZFXc3JZh99AXSxFickFjJwt+RSrwlV1FNGz4u3MFMUObZfUPom/6aIV4dP/ZfA p4+GErQr8LAeuDGhngFFMxaEudUwQvXwcVs8Qgl8XvrcTiQSN2VyPKIVTwlVuAXjzY3d FRY1edXZnT5a9bheSYCB5PuJTqW/N6w0exQyhDqiEhxsFddNNrKv+/axO31LX4jIoNyl P3/GjKEiU3XIX7ugwzdnvpNeOZDP3f6deooLTQc6ZIR1cNVomufe4cDaArDybG6OLXbO hghVflphZe+selwpiTeaIdMd77FafkAdMS/HnrblDrhmnDLcdrnD1X4Wmy4ESu+drbP/ WE2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533J/yx+UzDL8j8Yc0dGuGDTa0CN5nHMd63fAo2kK8bA9klF3drE VIdlX9tpm1NnpQNzc1yZoaZ3Kfxm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYBMsFIU+MIA+NDcdCLbRmy6ripkRLDXjiuVqK4n4sdfi+5VYr1lL05PqQ+nOKCX+sHma8mQ== X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce8b:: with SMTP id r11mr23388670ilo.86.1597151723052; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-il1-f174.google.com (mail-il1-f174.google.com. [209.85.166.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m14sm13244917ild.4.2020.08.11.06.15.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f174.google.com with SMTP id z17so10522280ill.6 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:143:: with SMTP id j3mr20729726ilr.97.1597151722045; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:14:46 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: Rowan Tommins , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000ba00c05ac99dd3d" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --0000000000000ba00c05ac99dd3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 14:59, Derick Rethans wrote: > >> I did answer that as a reply to Rowan: >> >> https://externals.io/message/111312#111346 > > > I'm with Rowan's response to you: > https://externals.io/message/111312#111354 > > What is the difference between mandatory parentheses giving: > > <><>( > <><>(<>), > 42 > ) > > and: > > <>[<>( > <>[<>(<>)], > 42 > )] > > in terms of parsing, use etc? > > Peter > Anyone? Why is the discussion fixated on [] rather than ()? Peter --0000000000000ba00c05ac99dd3d--