Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111461 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39466 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2020 13:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2020 13:34:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1A4180511 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:34:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:34:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1597149257; bh=jw46exPH2KyRNA2ydfIhObnLaV2y5UtEWA1LuzKMWWU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=l1PYUq2laUQyvC9WbnLG/0VbR0gTq1j/QZSKSaBkLQA2/sZRusYdtcOVvVpl8Zql8 i22AcwDuiYZ3Ukw576iWATuYHqKAaFA+sDf6GNufUlJK81SC6wcYbD+Q00RKeY7O0J VBKyorYVrsIU2j0dRZKf/eqlCx0HYOU7gdTnN7mU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.130] ([84.179.236.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MIdif-1jtfn33zDp-00Ehwy; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:34:17 +0200 To: Rowan Tommins , PHP internals References: <6cfb77d4d511b5c591e7d7b5cc80199955123b2cd4276a5bca2327e4b02942db@mahalux.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:34:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yIBNXGp39hyc74y4zGIYbxWy7gkljeHxzUsIVLrNpyaKmqt/KPF n6D6OtR2e1o0m/GuAUK33qbrbMhFNINcvJL5UJT/VAtfHNntYPXJ8vUQT2SNOxLGQVkN1Kz 1PUl0OH2KHq+JY5L9gYbCO2ZMnziOgGvBc4KM5RQArM9jEh6OOyHMlj3C1MMkhlLDpEfCS7 S3F5gJ4JmxYYtSBb0LWWg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:fZO99p8PtMI=:M1oyJaeXgor+3ij+xLrcTT YB19Fv8rfdsf+NooN2dzLW1sZqZi/nf9tsGciFm87gLBqEwV9IcQvt1uEpnS7Dc3YYUUlfpEU hGQ/fQrttDRWauq7HEzahkLv2d6scDNTqzvTtY5uTzPzNNmXyBN6HPfztEtGPvmBwxEZewaq+ 2asffSpzJKP3vhFjR4ltPANevkR0KU4cV3PnZuUB7VW3KO6g3rYwG5iXoaNgIqaGzyK6hMxwZ nc+Q8sD39x6utkEecOjQaNC+J4TOaQy8XL52LixBgfhBLEBul9UqGTyVVktK1fRd0LS/CEQqJ 33bOYVJ1P9ctRiiLEkjeJ1pV4AeH9kOmvuXKXEo1cCGTSNrnIYAW2V1TREZDRnFJpOLyQW6KN PZ9lf5rqIS50q2+ys2tTOTlmc7i6iBuYYIG3UML0qRIK/Fg/KPMe0wucaFtb2tHxOh0WzKhLd HgmYYw8/R6rQXeci4MvjKFaAGxP4AHQjpuyTIYIbwta8CzWEX7rxAD2W8F9Y5MCeU1aGMODdF yQbI6l9htFAMi15dyF3ztNrTAEJMVoxTI989iq0j+z+6sb7DUs60EJK5e4C85FlsJ5GYRNtFG N8jG89v7VFTYHNoAGP8ZYg+nkTTBrHW3oodRmNqmv5bTVV4jMGK89fehIYiZR1D5qoZeaMwei tBrTmo+iYBnZ9rKwuoFT1yu3GNlY1eUrW7LhWzVRh0xhlUctVphBkLgvrcpa0cTA4z/dVTqU7 m/PfW+LoZ1xv432yhCo3z46wWPNld9xaUh52k53j2YGKcNbznY4d/sZ5zlRLLqGlWcSbyHmaH Adr+KuFi98Ai4ezWJCfJFCcwtA0pVaTtx9VAKWUijAMTAPdmPJaDWpiwlPuioxlNetpTzRJ6g SkZQlotN/pK+Y/C64ZebPXjwDFWL1NtzHYacAxH2Bl7cCSbfhpwlD/4R0kks1b/CHKa5G3+7J CQqMHn1kpshT3RwBX1fGMq6N9C4aLzUVG6sGkkL3gvpb3oH3QswsFMNaeWT3lsxymuCm+gNBf ++BC5THW6T2xQIuYj5QU6gMTxWQUvdQlsvY2o1oKP1Wm8oFPumBlnf2zX01jzc6jLazMsWLLk Ntj7vB6ZUOGMiTMvr4jGquCCaXvdOuONU+U+OtaJR/DvR0TBA6WdWOAlgBntREtcZza0Vg9e0 YSfzy0PQlyaXytfvlri+PZMSvrgCSA0RrlzmzR2rDRyiBIjTjyY4FyAKjBFSeUPn05L2NVOqW hJF4WbBMrWKjcWmNjMXgMisqvv1Hc6cidXe4grQ== Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allow sleep() to accept non-integer values From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 11.08.2020 at 10:53, Rowan Tommins wrote: > Unless there are problems with the implementation, this seems like a > straight-forward win. Not necessarily a problem, but it has to be considered that POSIX mandates that nanosleep() shall fail, if "the rqtp argument specified a nanosecond value [=E2=80=A6] greater than or equal to 1000 million."[1] Analogous for usleep() which has been removed from the POSIX standard. [1] =2D- Christoph M. Becker