Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111424
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2008100935570.7489@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl>
 <5c73b8d0-f477-83a0-4bd4-2fb8d11ad416@seld.be>
Message-ID: <a5cd901d-86cc-b682-b148-0cb176b764a2@fischer.name>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:05:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5c73b8d0-f477-83a0-4bd4-2fb8d11ad416@seld.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 10.08.20 13:32, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > https://gist.github.com/Seldaek/b7a3bd28920c6cc181e67a829b13a81c
    This is really really useful! However I suggest to look at the raw text rather,
    because the highlighting is unaware of the syntax and may bias "how it feels
    to look at it" (*): [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: githubusercontent.com]
 -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A           Looks like a legit reply (A)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfG4jTIh06UqUf5MGYs6eFvmcGiaO6ZRdWgUl7ak55W4CN6EiHo1VoPYtjMHzrvmbZsVfoeYDA3ciNBZL2Kb7+/b9YjMU4E63R7z+bWmjIQEsIYS0Evuz
 ZxymCPEoaJlVE4UlbMrFtUnE1zx/qWsA6DmRRB8nEvfSVJMsJGf0h71O
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change
From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer)

On 10.08.20 13:32, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
> https://gist.github.com/Seldaek/b7a3bd28920c6cc181e67a829b13a81c

This is really really useful!

However I suggest to look at the raw text rather, because the 
highlighting is unaware of the syntax and may bias "how it feels to look 
at it" (*):

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Seldaek/b7a3bd28920c6cc181e67a829b13a81c/raw/ccb612d2547c99fe69d1bf09138efae22b956b37/attributes.php

Personally, and never gave it much thought TBH, the `@@` AND `<<`/`>>` 
in fact is the most "unreadable" version to me because duplicate 
occurrence of a single character somehow creates a noise _for me_,

I don't feel eligible to have a vote, but based on that and certainly 
aware IDEs in the future will help with this, I would vote for 
_anything_ not duplicating characters, i.e. favoring `#[]` or `@[]`

:-}

- Markus

(*) Apologies for lack of words trying to describe my thoughts