Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111418 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30642 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2020 10:29:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Aug 2020 10:29:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241891804AA for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-il1-f178.google.com (mail-il1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f178.google.com with SMTP id z3so6981739ilh.3 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7DVQ9G95T6dotPWN2e+rieG4dOcHrz2w3aLqb4mbMs4=; b=cKUKc6vhdd3RcNffjpf8LGlNlrIhXPcky22XH5LyQyrsYWBiynssLS7V37LgeIrr+P BSg5aScb5HrSmetlCeb61TZg/Fl++fvVfiqTAFqetxuBPbEiIaYg32mxG5nJawgEjo09 M1kDF6K9RyGntuWJBen/fkStiPdkOCPe8URwh/JXkup3cSF9bVAKQp5wC9Uc1GcXyKc2 bQFB3ic0/KfTawZdombYPIbpZ3rq3DFBdHlhfGsPgZp6uYWYaT+6OnlvybHaOO+g8PK5 xgNVo1jLJ43HJqU5M1YXPbsFPfC5AgKh5m2NAOhL+NrTfe8vlK4rtUmqe18GRf2rI2br KnAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7DVQ9G95T6dotPWN2e+rieG4dOcHrz2w3aLqb4mbMs4=; b=opYtu6JiTiaD+D1atob93kso4Kqz9PRz9jlJWj64d2M82HyiVrqAErqbrOdDO0e1Rv YICtGilbAj/vWY+TwE6elc/8CJpu6PEiQH7zt+ZxU5sdhavLEx+gwIobWZBeWKwraU+y 1GQTV7ZbjVJjHZ2F6uLfc50TTaKCML1hGKAX5ssBYoqWnq5z/dJzbUVbED8iH2cRtt5C 9fKXoVyKQ1xgNayctd2kaPpdF7FznNJ0WHooyuYrtZ8IksIAP1dM443OcE8w8hUlWp32 UxDhlQ1MvHiMME1OwOoeZUvc853nnW91imDPCtw3WXSnB+LaQEVXGXqR3ha0IwNTJ+k5 7U1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M15vrAwHOeyaLHzZrWjHgXF+G7imynR1gZUQX0vbIwmC/eH6J tKbOR651DiwQPKSZDO3PIRLGVozE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz125Tb8jpHX+eqoYZ4VOUVCFuMsHKYO2Ji6LVI/urd2yzKC/lD/Ovd0MD+0zC/fuQJeE/zdw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:1b11:: with SMTP id b17mr16092693ilb.126.1597051696735; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com. [209.85.166.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm11211669ilq.21.2020.08.10.02.28.15 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id h4so2378963ioe.5 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a02:2407:: with SMTP id f7mr19645086jaa.130.1597051695599; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:28:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:27:39 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Rowan Tommins Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000001285805ac82935f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --00000000000001285805ac82935f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 10:15, Rowan Tommins wrote: > I am not a fan of the @@ syntax, and respect what you're trying to do with > this RFC, but am disappointed you haven't engaged with those of us who said > that the RFC needs more detail. There is simply not enough information in > that table to "have an objective look", and the only other text in the RFC > makes a vague assertion about the lack of ending symbol which I still don't > understand the significance of. > I have voted no because I asked a question about the ending delimiter and why () didn't count. Another person asked a similar question and neither of us got a reply. Peter --00000000000001285805ac82935f--