Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111404 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66368 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2020 20:55:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2020 20:55:24 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDED18050B for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:54:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from blue.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (blue.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:54:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|josh@joshbruce.dev Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8563921587; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-5-126.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.5.126]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40F22921579; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 19:54:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|josh@joshbruce.dev Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:54:20 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|josh@joshbruce.dev X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Interest-Tangy: 4e6a693800cea519_1597002860688_3099270782 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1597002860688:3701686862 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1597002860688 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7767F5A9; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=joshbruce.dev; h=from :message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :cc:to:references; s=joshbruce.dev; bh=2GmLieHK/30ULc5cZJMvxMFW3 BY=; b=nLRwsgtCLn9wwC8OLWzYtzcnYyBU4cFbtrMIdwQ+ZeIp3aH/D5jqoaF2N ja85YUcYMjY9pH1rUhU2w0UKlJdcToGHsuKC6Iwj9uXAy0sD+X77yiokYiUPvU0C +O4ZtLGxgPmtniGFuwTvMtRejrt5U4pqofeb1wu5F1RIQLwI0E= Received: from joshs-mbp.lan (21.140.29.136.in-addr.arpa [136.29.140.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshbruce.dev) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B2B87F598; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:54:18 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a19 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E4E83673-5EC7-49A8-A934-7A754BE358D5" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 14:54:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1bc7759a-63b8-4b96-bb69-97b50f851307@www.fastmail.com> Cc: php internals To: Larry Garfield References: <21C5073D-3F39-49DA-8686-E027AE780793@joshbruce.dev> <1bc7759a-63b8-4b96-bb69-97b50f851307@www.fastmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -51 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkeeigddugeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnegoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmnecujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhshhcuuehruhgtvgcuoehjohhshhesjhhoshhhsghruhgtvgdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheelveeiieekteefteekteeikefgtdefvdejhfejffejhfdtudffleejgeffueetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehjohhshhgsrhhutggvrdguvghvpdgsihhtrdhlhidpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhphhhprdhnvghtnecukfhppedufeeirddvledrudegtddrvddunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghlohepjhhoshhhshdqmhgsphdrlhgrnhdpihhnvghtpedufeeirddvledrudegtddrvddupdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpeflohhshhcuuehruhgtvgcuoehjohhshhesjhhoshhhsghruhgtvgdruggvvheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhoshhhsehjohhshhgsrhhutggvrdguvghvpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehinhhtvghrnhgrlhhssehlihhsthhsrdhphhhprdhnvght Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Discussion] Objects can be declared falsifiable From: josh@joshbruce.dev (Josh Bruce) --Apple-Mail=_E4E83673-5EC7-49A8-A934-7A754BE358D5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Trying not to drown the list while some RFCs are getting worked out and = preparing for 8.0. Quick update: 1. Walking through Nikita=E2=80=99s instructions - writing about it = here: = https://joshbruce.dev/essays/software-development/php-falsifiable-objects = 2. I agree some type of working concept should be a thing. 3. Have some other projects taking precedent, any assistance on = implementation would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Josh > On Jul 22, 2020, at 7:49 AM, Larry Garfield = wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Josh Bruce wrote: >> Learning more everyday. This thread will be the =E2=80=9Cofficial = thread=E2=80=9D -=20 >> other related threads have been added to the RFC (including one from = 11=20 >> years ago): https://bit.ly/php-0002-rfc >>=20 >> Created fork - with PR on fork to explore and leave notes without=20 >> hitting the mailing list with every little thing:=20 >> https://github.com/joshbruce/php-src/pull/1=20 >> >>=20 >> Will be letting this cool down for the recommended two weeks while I=20= >> learn the things and PHP 8 is prepared for release. >>=20 >> Not sure if this should be put up for a vote before or after the=20 >> implementation based on what I=E2=80=99ve read so. Seems the = recommendation is=20 >> the vote first - unless sample implementation seems like it would be=20= >> helpful. I think it would; so, will proceed on the implementation=20 >> course pending feedback. >>=20 >> Thanks again for all the feedback, questions, and concerns! >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Josh >=20 > I'd say it's bad form to call a vote on something without at least a = partial implementation and a path to finish the implementation. = Otherwise, even if it passes it may not happen and that's just all kinds = of confusing. The code doesn't have to be perfect, but at least enough = to demonstrate it can be done and won't cause a 50% performance = regression. That also gives voters confidence that if the RFC passes = the code will actually get completed by the people that proposed it, = rather than just expecting someone else to magically do it for them. >=20 > --Larry Garfield >=20 > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20 --Apple-Mail=_E4E83673-5EC7-49A8-A934-7A754BE358D5--