Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111288 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90631 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2020 23:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2020 23:44:22 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527571804E6 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:41:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com (mail-io1-f67.google.com [209.85.166.67]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id v6so21501980iow.11 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 15:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joeferguson-me.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4fjgoUNMSFF3DRdfJFIUuvnMnO4OllFa3p+ktuE1SiQ=; b=PbUlcGGu8lyznvHdAzDfD20ZPNvG1ZuxY9Y9Rd5as3WMRe0Cp2t9S2awtavblFEKXO MPtuwhFAGaEdmbs/YGM2IAgpYneBAagWWEGwDhMs/vDZBShaZ+upyn/v4XtxS6xB0anT 5g+uEE+hqolj8KmhW0v6Dupt49FcgOAMT8wpDL85vKwKi6JlVuOPF19h7Tf8KSEV3qO9 xndrl4qAMT7s3BFzd1y3edRkgOahNAiIK/8B3TJN2i14FD4wjsQIxBLPi3Q94D0qrGEp 6uBW2UWLvfq38jiWr7JOo77QWq9cdDee9GNXTpvdyDpgBXzX3c64qVno31iS9KXCFJfT 3+cA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4fjgoUNMSFF3DRdfJFIUuvnMnO4OllFa3p+ktuE1SiQ=; b=FybO8aOwErua9+JBRVHq1Lq60lu54oerrkJWi+99Vn5+l939eumPUVk0sEPW3ohUBX mMRMYvzFJsUF9d66vkqPJZ8AE5ktO3bBbsZq1HFfKMC7mIxy1i/T+OwEqeBZ43e7XJI2 lXhQPXgNuLZfQVN4t9TwqnLRreDuMhzBLS1SuOXh302Z0gCxPBko2dp6YaEyf9MoJlWj RsvhW/GCLWtUJH1cOyPhU6DNjmjL6GGfpAYvaa8GUvIR1IKenttrGq0w4HXwoYzoxCPd t1u12uNNhsRXzHmXY0t6CsFqqHoHv8aN7PuILXQkI9YXIOKiieXkdTE4qcXMvFpT44mw 3e6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323lq1gysK561rpcBmb9k7iIWqyZ7CMPNyKO425xORcIzUSBvLF 0cHmvkqeELeV0gnCXgtaT6aC9mOZ9k05KLjGbCN7gJNzJeg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyM+gebufra3duasjgR3v8p1e/4lCJ/fRLjsBxtwVIGknEipWdkJj0h/vl8h642xYENmXEipGzMmzy8B5mC/14= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f911:: with SMTP id j17mr13668614iog.96.1596408092729; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 15:41:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:40:56 -0500 Message-ID: To: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048b75705abecb9f4" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: joe@joeferguson.me (Joe Ferguson) --00000000000048b75705abecb9f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:11 AM Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > > > I think it has become clear that we need to revisit this syntax question > > again, including the elephpant in the room of delaying this feature to > 8.1. > > > > The reason is not only Joe's desire to revote on #[], but also that there > > are now more syntax proposals such as @[] by Derick or @@ in comments by > > Tyson (though no patch exists for it yet). At this point a lot of > syntaxes > > are potentially viable (except single @, please don't suggest it). > > > > I feel the choice between many syntaxes is 80% subjective, 20% objective > > facts, so tensions are to be expected. > > > > As the author of the original RFC and patch, I hope I have some klout in > > suggesting the following procedure (RMs would need to extend their > approval > > for revote to this). > > This seems like a sensible solution. > > cheers, > Derick > Sounds good to me as well. I'll update this RFC to Declined. Thanks, everyone for the discussion and everyone who reviewed the RFC and gave feedback on ideas and code examples. -- - Joe Ferguson JoeFerguson.me osmihelp.org --00000000000048b75705abecb9f4--