Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111255 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38524 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2020 20:32:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2020 20:32:37 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94EB180510 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com [209.85.167.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k22so21746069oib.0 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:28:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cCPm6voksHwJ6SU1+luFQ7hbVoJXzoBmvBKp4cUiDz0=; b=WLt4bDTXQ2yaNetIuLTVPyfbLNBvI1ZwT/68+zGG3BbLfE3FzInLRDrS+4IGPnAYbW 6Nr4bg1QIXatITWCFZOh3i/Hb68a7nJHygLCvvON3EbKb3WHDLlFQwCGaKD0Uvl1HZ9s Kt9Dw4MxSFHDCo6uIEhwvhUxoQOKzKmTQDZ2UsePQ9tV5wYj5kVdGKoPpFLEUtHeFFzH pfbDEfJ64BdcidiCc/YiXXl8yFbBM6sOlaSIPfJiNT0MxFC+Y+y4cJPh2l04JhJOwJz1 LmV14NjwHM6jo6slaDVVlZ69EIeWRcQVorcNKR/ShBDkvr1ivdbZy6JYN0/6KsI+otnx 7JQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cCPm6voksHwJ6SU1+luFQ7hbVoJXzoBmvBKp4cUiDz0=; b=W63T3+l0GK2FLmKwEj0mQLSXqVsnjF9GOk4tGhzIlw50aq/pyAZpVM8iizT3r8LEHC 8dx+6P+pIfT3HvgWLxiwRg8ahhLWC41esMPeMGmUZYbc6wgFzyj2a0u9ViP662R1ejIH ohuZ45i5YPTFLvaMdOlJ2xDJul36YqSGWCI9fEN5c5vUqcx0GJwwKIEGxnza8fPTelOU Ixyi6fGS/iZS57IUrAueFgki63oEjMw2vV6Lmedy1uHt9MQVeiUnXKLbPySdT9H/sGBl 2YumPv6DfB4EnXE3yxe1qSOUryO8V5L4HNUeLt9CK0gYKKx75mXj8q1bJBFe0RckCcqb uMlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JKmHm1DGCr7WhXYpKb+6To9AXFBD1VbCjHnZF0d5Da+sAhJ6e znBLDp3o7VrdcDwm9kLaOHv2Enu0ZDbJJN0TBow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPHhgnvaDyIuWP6sXC6Ow+LADr9KuRcg07nNHOB4ho63n1QLYbbVc9nQkWwwQiyM3tb6SF0F/BnLBTmHBtsfk= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3c45:: with SMTP id j66mr8606450oia.101.1596050927436; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:28:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:28:36 +0200 Message-ID: To: Theodore Brown Cc: Mark Randall , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000092c92605ab999094" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Marcin_Brzuchalski?=) --00000000000092c92605ab999094 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Theodore, =C5=9Br., 29 lip 2020 o 21:08 Theodore Brown napis= a=C5=82(a): > ... > Anyway, apart from the fact that feature freeze is less than a week > away, it seems like voting again to use #[] instead of @@ would > violate the voting rules. [1] It hasn't been six months since the > last vote, and this proposal is identical to the one declined in the > previous RFC. > Which declined/rejected RFC you're referring to? I can't find it on the list[1] but would for sure like to read it again. [1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc#declined Cheers, Micha=C5=82 Marcin Brzuchalski --00000000000092c92605ab999094--