Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111243 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70031 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2020 07:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2020 07:17:10 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8AF18050A for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:13:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f170.google.com (mail-oi1-f170.google.com [209.85.167.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y22so19757312oie.8 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:13:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Nw8fDqKQhUR24vhUDdgRvpt02pdgVE/RyK1h7SlaqJc=; b=akyPtOjYkQGGUAkUwg1B+si1bNpnadlv+mEcComd6SLaQ2vGgvlz/RMYTRgKrjPzM9 HuHKpgwedvt66TGfa0kfbIl7LZf00jQfXoQw3bjE7vTH8mAgmrJY5Y3JT3AKyeDTrW2i w9l7vpZHLshpAu62AEmYPNS0AI2h6qmrmFvPhEElyLxqyHtbTA/dTBFCZFPkhzurFFzp gLTKLqFmIfcehgCFgafZnLFe0mKMBbtORSBskZq+bByRsxC+p/hf4qoSxTAHUq3qodoK wCBZQqTNAfDMJvgyrmRFg8K+PRyd7B8bvyzJ6KAIdJcbdN5/iBR8RCiQD0NVmAaMxJHF vZyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nw8fDqKQhUR24vhUDdgRvpt02pdgVE/RyK1h7SlaqJc=; b=TYBpqGuX0HoZrUrXU/IxrSA5HyWkpzu9E0Na6txoVA/8Xq5dpf/CNPT1XsA8w4QllK Vkdk6IwIcK603+QmIwGwycbXcsFa3hiiw4YdZcoRw89EYq6YazVZyAt+cX7jE85pqIfK sZroKOY6UycV14zVDNuYnfxe0VLExMr0ot4GexhJBnUpKsp+iBqaPrHuJpInWowRhlx4 V5s/CyvZWtmX0GqmoGLve50TsRMiSs2M017PgDxtsOpkvuUzoAVkyJknJg/LgMQ/V/uP VthZ4lFoIdsIIPSXp5s4Eddo5kuaDoHi5kgzbpEbuw87SW88GfhBVS8m8dgepu92GmRM kNdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531S0+kPW395f1FPgkOvNdOP2IfyfwwTD0Tdd9vwABl9FCXjQBdo iw97hFxmXNam01S3XyJ0XdFYh12VzEqdFhTw5QM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIw2cccOgRwF7NniYGTpyvCvXJHvBllv/Jefy3lyb1yeqZ/81sHiY6QK1CelZOBoErNpoH8cz1BgZkVwqslIc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4ec1:: with SMTP id c184mr6687528oib.112.1596003191472; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:13:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <79DC1760-6BBC-45E2-A5CC-0E0C076204B7@pmjones.io> In-Reply-To: <79DC1760-6BBC-45E2-A5CC-0E0C076204B7@pmjones.io> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:13:00 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Paul M. Jones" Cc: Theodore Brown , Joe Ferguson , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000049c79205ab8e7394" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change From: michal.brzuchalski@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Marcin_Brzuchalski?=) --00000000000049c79205ab8e7394 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, wt., 28 lip 2020 o 20:56 Paul M. Jones napisa=C5=82(a)= : > ... > Let's count. + is "change away from @@ to anything else", - is "stay with > @@", ? is hard-to-tell/weak/uncertain/they-all-suck. > ... > Michal Brzuchalski: -? > Wow. Hold on your horses. I was never in favour for @@ but always against at least AFAIR. Where did you get that? Anyway it should be ++ here > > ++: 13 definitely prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not > necessarily #[]) > ++: 14 definitely prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not necessarily #[]) > +?: 10 probably prefer changing to something other than @@ (though not > necessarily #[]) > ??: 23 hard-to-tell/weak/uncertain/they-all-suck > -?: 3 probably prefer to keep @@ > -?: 2 probably prefer to keep @@ --: 4 definitely prefer to keep @@ > It's hard to rely fully on your statement considering such a mistake. Cheers, Micha=C5=82 Marcin Brzuchalski --00000000000049c79205ab8e7394--