Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111174
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <CAEPJdu=H1j4C8TvdQF=dbMSKUUM=1-3hVkPf1f3WU-hZgKiy8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:50:05 +0200
Cc: Chris Riley <t.carnage@gmail.com>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID:
 <VI1PR02MB4703F7E73D33AF4390337E6DE2770@VI1PR02MB4703.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABHuAWx16_6rwye6BC4gUctSEdTTV0bq68S=1znNPykwGzXTsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABHuAWy4C0ng5SnEBM6SybcyvO0+MPiHcVcEvDrFG4fNsf2Opw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEPJdu=H1j4C8TvdQF=dbMSKUUM=1-3hVkPf1f3WU-hZgKiy8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from [IPv6:2001:7e8:cbfb:7a00:3929:e5aa:660b:d9ad] (2001:7e8:cbfb:7a00:3929:e5aa:660b:d9ad) by PR0P264CA0281.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:100:1::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:50:06 +0000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID:
 <06F95414-9FB4-408D-9528-E408E404C9E0@hotmail.com>
X-TMN: [akDSO04yeTLDW/BBgwFuuRwY4qKkpF93Gyd7I+Tl4aoi1we5ES1Vq0pheY0NwIb7]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 49
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 65886ac3-59c0-40e5-25a0-08d82fe0db14
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: VI1EUR04HT021:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info:
	XSl3kMd1Z2+mKNLENwRJMXMChsvAbnc/sevvp3dDnKtaF+lQuXYfCR8RKNXVNeEUs2P8YRz5zWxkTodfpLwTbi1rwAAvxf45B+E1X50nWYquoeDPez5DKLMYqIjfTo7/k1PEOCfZeHwP2tEKELCyPHv3E1hwGOEXdYEK9tuv7QlAikqNBOehsDXaN4pJ7Y5iidFUpk5vQEY37PRF1NVsp8MMQ0DeCHkuRr6ew2pG0/BPXVG1Q46zqt/FvXpizEMV
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report:
	CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:0;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:VI1PR02MB4703.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFTY:;SFS:;DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData:
	9PfXPYGeKUqvmJ9LF+ilrKFmBjuB3MWteOj6o82Rkuw7Qw5hk4wpaGdBXT/AMPKK/rECCcarIvuwKiqtWRVlX8UoUezBaS1E2cDttqXmWs2dbOCNElESW/2Yl4veM0MmCLafCXv07U4wAEv/2ySRFVebgeWorsOqU2cKuPXuzlEMQHV7M3ftPOF9dqYAbupeDMiWm68sU0u/5Pa0Cy8D9A==
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 65886ac3-59c0-40e5-25a0-08d82fe0db14
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2020 14:50:07.3651
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource:
	VI1EUR04FT046.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg:
	00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1EUR04HT021
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Proposal] Renamed parameters
From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand)

> Am 24.07.2020 um 16:11 schrieb Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>:
>=20
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Chris Riley <t.carnage@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hi all,
>>=20
>> Following up from this I've created a draft RFC:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/renamed_parameters will move to in discussion
>> once
>> I've ensured everything important has been captured.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Chris
>>=20
>=20
> You added PHP 8.0 as a propsoed version, but that will not be possible
> anymore 2 weeks of discussion + 2 weeks of voting are not possible to fit
> in before the feature freeze, which is in 11 days.

Hey Benjamin,

While you are technically correct, the primary point of a feature freeze is=
 not allowing in completely new features.
It will always happen that there are changes and extensions to RFCs introdu=
ced for the next version which may need to be addressed first, because ther=
e is massive benefit to the new feature in that case. (from a backwards/for=
wards compatibility standpoint for example)

I do not necessarily agree with the RFC (not given it much thought yet), bu=
t I think such RFCs shall still be able to be introduced later on (well, no=
t in RC phase, but a bit after the feature freeze cutoff), if there is actu=
al benefit from them not being deferred to the next version. Ultimately, th=
e RM has to make the call (also to avoid indefinite delays or filibustering=
 or such).

Bob=