Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111146
Return-Path: <marandall@php.net>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 70806 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2020 08:45:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2020 08:45:39 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <alpine.DEB.2.23.453.2007221247530.7489@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl>
 <CAESVnVqprgkgcjYPs5pE6pMe2b=LoZxfKDB1F-8NDwoo_ab83w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVqaMs73HS583BoT2o4TEV8weFUTDKnwdUNq1YgfrYLVgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200723062654.4993A1011B2@smtp-in.fusiondirectory.org>
 <20200723090247.37c1760b@mcmic-probook.opensides.be>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:40:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200723090247.37c1760b@mcmic-probook.opensides.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The @@ is terrible, are we sure we're OK with it?
From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall)
Message-ID: <php.internals-111146@news.php.net>

On 23/07/2020 08:02, Côme Chilliet wrote:
> To be clear, is there anyone who voted for @@ and changed his mind based on new
>   information?
Please see the initial discussion here:

https://externals.io/message/110568#111038