Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111130 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48907 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2020 17:57:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2020 17:57:13 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38086180509 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:51:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11BDF10C075; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:51:41 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:51:40 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl To: Dik Takken cc: Joe Ferguson , Gabriel Caruso , PHP Developers Mailing List , Sara Golemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.23 (DEB 453 2020-06-18) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The @@ is terrible, are we sure we're OK with it? From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 22 Jul 2020, Dik Takken wrote: > We do not know what the @@ voters would have chosen if the choice was > between << >> and #[]. In case the @@ voters have a preference for > <<>> the result could turn out differently. The only way to know is to > take another vote. This is something that STV is specifically designed to solve. You rank in order by preference. And @@, <<>>, and #[] were all three options. In your example, these people would have marked @@ as first, <<>> as second, and #[] as third. cheers, Derick