Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111115 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8067 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2020 15:03:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2020 15:03:48 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073F51804D0 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:58:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from smtp-in.fusiondirectory.org (smtp-in.fusioniam.org [195.154.20.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-in.fusiondirectory.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in.fusiondirectory.org (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DCFD1011AD for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.fusiondirectory.org (smtp.fusioniam.org [195.154.20.141]) by smtp-in.fusiondirectory.org (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 464FE100A02 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mcmic-probook.opensides.be (63.120.199.77.rev.sfr.net [77.199.120.63]) by smtp.fusiondirectory.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AF2787DB1 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:58:11 +0200 To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20200722155811.370c999c@mcmic-probook.opensides.be> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: FusionDirectory X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The @@ is terrible, are we sure we're OK with it? From: come.chilliet@fusiondirectory.org (=?UTF-8?B?Q8O0bWU=?= Chilliet) Le Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:00:10 +0100 (BST), Derick Rethans a =C3=A9crit : > Please, let's do the sensible and use the Rusty #[...] syntax. This syntax is the one I liked the less in the proposed choices, given # is used for comments. Wouldn=E2=80=99t #[] cause more parsing issues than @@? What would be the rule, it=E2=80=99d be illegal to start a comment content = with '['? C=C3=B4me