Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111107 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89305 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2020 13:50:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2020 13:50:10 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DEF1804C8 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:44:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qv1-f52.google.com (mail-qv1-f52.google.com [209.85.219.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-f52.google.com with SMTP id t7so921421qvl.8 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:44:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AH9GnzUSDVrs9txD5wPjr1QG8+f92IWXcujsgek7amc=; b=dcYEAhD3kUw/uhS+MBOhTvcp4KB6j159WUEq9s7JxiQbZYoMXFjIe5WDZ7zZv1kfYx 4sJ7YoW2G2OaYqhpVYiMc1Z+aMN4kCCYg7SlECKrVf+A4y8axVcuqOgJfgXYoXZAkgtW 1c1iLTx7jhyEgWZgiII0zC/8plneLHgCtmKvGZ9apIMPZx+2T6ZthR8PUTrYcyYCfr0p M6rLCNQIItDSVIu8HVLjOUO4t/H+dgrm+xqCvviSDTUZgMTdx5mvnsGrjpfeBGrlHOLh MwHiCPyd/AD8QYPFst4jNL4FtltvQE+eWydDiKYh/wQn1tKlcyVmVjTQ0P+vmr8PdQf/ KoZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rk0fU5A0LSyzHeUVe//kZRMUn32JnGiVPtLR/xHpI7bl3Pex9 ShVn3LOH3cpShIPG5fn+YP8JuAoo6GQ+aqUObX88Bg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyupjBvu88cay+r1ILF1/HVD7JI/jus0D3Nmoe7B/0MlUQB/9txl15pgiHrCE1l56oaqMg/HfE3jzQE7D5IGV0= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4b62:: with SMTP id m2mr32177472qvx.68.1595421871928; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:44:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:44:21 +0100 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f17a8d05ab07198b" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The @@ is terrible, are we sure we're OK with it? From: bukka@php.net (Jakub Zelenka) --000000000000f17a8d05ab07198b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:00 PM Derick Rethans wrote: > Hi all, > > I know we've voted twice on this already, but are we really sure that > the @@ syntax is a good idea? > I agree that @@ is really bad. Personally I'd prefer <<...>> but #[...] seems fine as well (although it's a minor BC break as there could be a valid comment). I think there are more people that are fine with both <<...>> and #[...] but don't like @@. Maybe having an option to vote for more options would be more suitable here or something where it's possible to vote against @@ rather than just pick one option. Cheers Jakub --000000000000f17a8d05ab07198b--