Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111102 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79450 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2020 13:15:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2020 13:15:57 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4ED180509 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:10:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id q74so2296458iod.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:10:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8XhiDEaaAJkm7YKz1HnId67ccKjqeoimXk7aX+Y6xbo=; b=I7roYf2CThuLGxyD9ZnyLOY8ffdnwZ9Mf7m/3i1X6wZPN+QgWyVQVJVQNgWIDnAtoV zUVmLJVBMWYP4tUcWx80GgLgcC605XF1kidSCyKXI6aqGE+HCDiz+e/yt3FtiFE1qInb Skxyflhs1BVAHfQiY16IvSvEd9tPxeZwlFgneMj3Uw6WtFMFfwyggwRLaTa57VVNUJcd 9FX4fcT6DFeQSmzlxdwt3p1CvRGfxQcRqZp+dvHgkGR6INDKqAeoW5pll9tePJ8XwQsi 1m6I2P2UZhm+5Xt+oWKoc7UmU3G4QJU3Jb5TfvOI/YMtLiLAzCRPWqtcQVFdsr+azu3b jeKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8XhiDEaaAJkm7YKz1HnId67ccKjqeoimXk7aX+Y6xbo=; b=mdGgEKUSPJNbNUon+3Vd0lMLfbU7ja1b6voIIGU/+vhSl+KOTpVRxEvjLVlDjv3O9l QZ/cgz3T4pGCn4DLZ5fCjKxarNZ9lXXlExEZzGeVRESPr9/CBCZfYWcwq4PLwyOwo/As 89IIcqvQtrPYPliUBlcL7yoJjvFqx/fggoo5Y6NTviEMC+i97OMGV/tItf73VMS9FVk0 WpFgypYKrndpZljzHiTj6ru6a/FrSXdky1RUrYa78EHvgD7BodiT5YzKieMhE+vY2IhJ nkv7rY7/oz5W34J5xc4ShlyJfW3oDlQZ7UK9lEossG1AGtjoAuNAhKOB6gN1UHrAeNgp grLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FN7tICqWPtK2CaAC5uCTiBYTXt+GgjwfyknwcWBx9nxa1B0Lj KaFK2Dmum4WfzrH+c6gcFIxdJmBIox+ZL5gsk8U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxA/ShtJlfbF3RdEoHHiB3TUhqOTqpMyFFNwa0Bl5RR6M7haobBTOU8y+rYpjR9YJnxGDF5kX/49nbDxHMGtO4= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c91a:: with SMTP id z26mr33030099iol.70.1595419820156; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:10:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:10:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a5ebf105ab069fbe" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The @@ is terrible, are we sure we're OK with it? From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --000000000000a5ebf105ab069fbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:00 PM Derick Rethans wrote: > Hi all, > > I know we've voted twice on this already, but are we really sure that > the @@ syntax is a good idea? > Pretty much clear that @@ is a bad choice - it was picked due to familiarity of some folks with java annotations, but it is clear that rust-ish annotations with a clear delimiter have technical advantages in parsing and future scope/support. Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/ --000000000000a5ebf105ab069fbe--