Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:111068
Return-Path: <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 35101 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2020 11:19:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2020 11:19:28 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6406B18050A
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,
SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id z24so11945044ljn.8
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc;
bh=49pN2ynTzTKljhPK6I+Y9+N3/V3dZtQa4N3hSslqYxg=;
b=eLrNVsrXiR5uIFj50zNCuQi0zrusOV798AKyEzzhxXNrIdyIkTUQJ5WVL6oCmYlOBt
5DuJXxOtKPb6uMMmh5n2HF+2E/4AIN6cOOA1qluFvCGEtzW+su6FEeB0HsLkWoVKnZnF
dqFRAOi4zXc5flnS3j5U2zhTyEozBTAOVQtBNmNkdXULR0jAGpg9yvxZ6QEP7No0+9Se
9CbBR0YZSM7q80448K+t9PmevLgLAWF+tdLa8VfKPZlyAAsSrDy79qAQV248qWEtkyxE
wKtzwsczqvRedpdH1GGF4X0LbB0aUwSB7kEyGrUyZmrYZqkNwd4P2/2Epgg6wUERutFp
ciXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=49pN2ynTzTKljhPK6I+Y9+N3/V3dZtQa4N3hSslqYxg=;
b=rShYtJ4XiXNeRMFK4vyC+tKS6xx4ht++PlLIM95pIt7/ErQNlXcIpl2cnXD3A1BM05
tGTSuGvey+a9TVNZUpuO0k4nE0CX3KR8PieaIELf0y92g4yL2YbwsgQmRxs2So4Jqp0m
qMjhBpr6dC+lh7DZj0Ip5mKhHynXcGH9uPDQDYWMH8UyUeN4HBzYc2b6/6bcdLVgCqn5
W9Ng69YpRAjN13kf4jhq+Ek0BAPOxQLNx2cur4ZdX9cLLdqZWdb2CKsa+Scrl+p66XJf
rXh6wnw3/FD4gs6NFHT2W+qh3QvClGAC04CinWmSiRPJ1XP5bsPthSiI8YrbtMLaDN4O
h+Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306SLjTjIKqYSatuqwVhc+AgegZBKWqCfa/EuF0pzUQrzuMaeph
jO8tVMoCXku7WMWL8j/c0ArIj3vkpip00yev4dQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5rZtaL6TX4ud6p2tDwGQMueF0MaeeyJ6gxDagzZ7h8mLb5l8LFR2nimF+o4TNHsvv8iranb7oo7BGvUN59cA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:850b:: with SMTP id j11mr4474628lji.30.1594980755694;
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c_TqgaY_srwX5w1EtqKRnR91_KebOp1cqyqrdvghrNGpg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOWwgp=O7d52_ks6N5s03O0DQGsmMNFURGWd8v4qpQbL+YkcAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOWwgp=O7d52_ks6N5s03O0DQGsmMNFURGWd8v4qpQbL+YkcAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:12:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c_x6Rv3pHJeb53p1bo=aHcedV-E4x2W_ThLdXCXQbqdPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005de6c805aaa065c6"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 8.0
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)
--0000000000005de6c805aaa065c6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:14 AM Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> It's that time of year again. Feature freeze is looming, so it's time to
>> talk about deprecations!
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_0
>>
>
> Thanks for the RFC.
> Would it make sense for you to postpone this for 8.1?
> I'm talking with my experience on Symfony here: we decided to give ppl
> some rest when they upgrade and always have our *.0 versions
> deprecations-free.
> Chasing BC breaks is a hard enough task for ppl to upgrade. Adding the
> additional step of solving deprecations is extra work that is not needed
> yet. I know solving deprecations is optional, but many teams have CI that
> fail on deprecations.
>
> I think it could be nicer to the userland community to have a smother path
> here, IMHO.
>
> Nicolas
>
I've retargeted this RFC to PHP 8.1 now. These deprecations are not
time-critical, there has been little discussion of the deprecations
themselves, and we're already in feature freeze induced RFC overload...
Nikita
--0000000000005de6c805aaa065c6--