Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110912 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33799 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2020 10:29:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2020 10:29:59 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D61180508 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 02:21:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 02:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id e64so5295155iof.12 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 02:21:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BQhrRw6OnhkbQlpfq1cPlt0uH5wxuVvikZkiuED2sYY=; b=TZWobyoEnMH9oRMJZR0BrysMFQEF8qtIS66WrGfIHB1WDdKy0Gd97u+YBIJvkI7vlT kpV0NQndSSBaEjr1Ti0K6cSAt7mLPaRWvQhRmmXAnwtzXMVQGEbASNkv+xbnRIz6zul4 2ncb3rUbPqddJH5VgiOTdMCJI5j4fiCfiOvGEvex8SkxI0ASOKOvmQVUBYx0PpL4XeEA hj2xH+HK/qYwriYzgIfsy0eBsN6xwkx+9NoD2HHwMs5GYCA37zjTrF8tVMrFD7Ni+FMy nQlTX5bjsZz038FAx4udsp90/QWmLEMqBo0eBzbJ57tEKTCQZOpTtJe1aBZdTIRZHKed wlzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BQhrRw6OnhkbQlpfq1cPlt0uH5wxuVvikZkiuED2sYY=; b=fyVy/cjfzSeWIH4ZCalyBHRPtEL4KUzTIs9GUqxhbAqLNv8yOB+4qNF/KDSFxvXEaX prTgAnlqyBRyBQBk/i34flMRNce3qYUH62xndgav/zD2EvulID2TvATn1wG37xr3O8j5 3cx+v/NdKH6ZlTb2Fn3YX+P02dRlr/DowEHa/SbsJqLDXcSTZ20ngniUsruSrwTf0SaA C9cHKDBNmE8lKltjTT6WCB6seefewifKLUaUz6kRRDki1GWsIS8H+NaEw2MPHFCOOelc RSb4KXB79poT78LmYBGe4GvXAGeNtmT2atw4B0vF+wjfHPrE3V/mVB40V60XN2pR4V0U pRzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZVApeWBIsq9a/+ExPdnmylnibmUsQilQCmxeOBHOahXZWLOcW mthhksUHw+o+jpcMbJt+njPivrFvUZyNRnFILoE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzApLus7srvoODbfmgkUWM4b3hd5O+H/NMJfNbPxAy5RqXTCe30SxWi4bw5LG20B1K/eLBD/xbHrQxKLJOADws= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2c0a:: with SMTP id w10mr46052441iov.46.1594372880326; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 02:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:21:09 +0200 Message-ID: To: Nikita Popov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002be62f05aa12dd90" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Named arguments From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta) --0000000000002be62f05aa12dd90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Nikita, I kept my "NO" stance here, as per discussion in https://externals.io/message/110004#110005, where I provided (in my opinion) good/safe alternatives to arrays as input parameters. The BC implications on this RFC still largely outweigh any advantages that it brings, from my perspective. Greets, Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/ On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:42 AM Nikita Popov wrote: > Hi internals, > > I have opened voting on the named arguments RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params > > Voting will close on 2020-07-24. > > Regards, > Nikita > --0000000000002be62f05aa12dd90--