Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:110897
Return-Path: <someniatko@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 25065 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2020 15:36:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2020 15:36:14 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF6D1804E6
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 07:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <someniatko@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 07:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id w3so2026047wmi.4
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=TTE2HylksDX1jVyGEHRbPM8DO6RJaM+zX2S99QAr0BE=;
        b=TaHEBj6S53PJLkTxou1MAGgzjtUj94An+87qOAvDD2cQWLld1BKelm7ETIAACPdIDy
         Mir9x/Zjs8PPZZss6iMaMDz9d3mPBDEom/0tlmoYcCdJfKLqlHu5B4K0UGBS88VnLxPu
         j06A0xDUK9X9RP7J02S23CCRYKnD6x6m0ANexlXLUyqYjSy30DtkiLfzCsYLJZdgFEOC
         aDHwKdl5+J7E8P3fnitq8uVU18wD01TNgJnLqLB00gmf+YS5xunEc875e38RDIIFanpD
         0FCg8Nckc8m3ZvTWkrQR7FVSYEFoid3q7auEufa8DVML7A7ByV3EwoIFeHdyK2eDqvOq
         3cxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=TTE2HylksDX1jVyGEHRbPM8DO6RJaM+zX2S99QAr0BE=;
        b=PwImiZOpZdOsQPkEhDe1fsuegZI+Y2GIBynhPdHN7JtotE8bPg1RCW88lxl4DYGB/t
         h1pLg5HErQ77fY0z5eLtJzCbrsy5l8gXSn0hZD0Go+TiCSyKQhVuRhCYvNbbyUvh7QkC
         LQa5V7OQSKFSrrUg3dyCw/t0UH8sfifk3zOnTUbtjqx4Gbg6XuICQ+RzGgSdgY5WqTdv
         zelyWj6CE0ZwQ8pU4vHIPVYY+UXgUEvmtVNk3O130VR7XSBItCPjcl5HiDZ+tS2uloIl
         uWcO4ccobU1J5NRj8fn9iBfY8LTHQvw26f7Qb5tjM3OZ1EstZyED1PUWJDhOKjgYIchA
         ANaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jvz7PFfq4f2ImEGvnZ8aTYjPlhZuUsC96madlbYyAXJaKo5Wp
	etrC/mewPJfTDlPUSjcyqz2/CqIJFHSMyz7faqT4CjZeGlo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGGFxR9DV4KVqxywv6RKotB11uq1HZhh1W31JbsEZVHnfv14GGROuJp8N9hJAtYr8HLbskxY7GNla/pxXnXQ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd07:: with SMTP id f7mr260574wmj.115.1594304846412;
 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANeKSiRe95yUeyUV5S3MU1Bzh7A_Z0OQF_WVNFK16CcbE5wYqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANeKSiTH3kuzJ+MemxvMTHfcA_T2M=nXgKGN1eirqFuxx-J5tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEPJduk40QJwtbzVMaopEDa21peNh=xJT-YNnLL4HQ9=PaC-5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEPJduk40QJwtbzVMaopEDa21peNh=xJT-YNnLL4HQ9=PaC-5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:27:14 +0300
Message-ID: <CABAhh3FaLK4fsKFaDr9eXs0tT=EF5c_qATOhjQmxLhQBQ4azWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
Cc: Benas IML <benas.molis.iml@gmail.com>, PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Make constructors and destructors
 return void
From: someniatko@gmail.com (someniatko)

> I think going from forbidding
> return types on ctors to requiring them to be void is one step to far.

I am afraid you've slightly misunderstood the intention of this RFC.
It is proposed that it is impossible to return anything from the
constructor, not that you have to add ": void" to it.